Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

The [American] Declaration of Independence



July 04, 2010 – Comments (9)

In the State House in Philadelphia, America was being born (234 years ago).

On Monday, July 1, 1776, John Adams made the case for independence. Now is the time, the facts are inescapable, the people are for it, we are not so much declaring as acknowledging reality.  "We are in the very midst of revolution, the most complete, unexpected, and remarkable of any in the history of the world."  After nine hours of debate, the voting commenced. The yeses held a majority, but there were more noes than expected. Someone moved a final vote be taken the next morning. Everyone hastily agreed. That night word reached Philadelphia that the British fleet, numbering over a hundred ships, had been sighted off New York harbor.

On July 2, the final voting began. It went quickly. This was a pivotal moment in the political history of man. The vote was completed: 12 for independence, New York abstaining, no one opposing. The break was made, in words at least: on July 2, 1776, in Philadelphia, the American colonies declared independence. If not all 13 clocks had struck as one, twelve had, and with the others silent the effect was the same.

On July 3, Congress argued over the wording and exact content of the formal Declaration. An indictment of the slave trade was dropped. In all, Thomas Jefferson saw roughly 25% of what he'd written wind up on the floor.

On July 4, discussion ended, debate was closed, a vote on the final draft of the Declaration of Independence was called, and the results were as on July 2. Congress ordered the document be printed. They'd sign it in a month. For now, John Hancock and one other, Charles Thompson, fixed their signatures.

"When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to separate.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed ... "

In the end, the Continental Congress would not produce only an act of the most enormous human and political significance, the creation of America, it would provide history with one of the few instances in which a work of true literary genius was produced, in essence, by committee. The writing of the King James Bible is another.

9 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On July 04, 2010 at 10:24 AM, amassafortune (29.05) wrote:

We tend to focus on the stirring words which do mark a turning point in the way people would demand to be governed for eternity. Let's also remember that each signer provided with their mark, proof of treason in the eyes of the regime at that time. 

Of our current politicians, who do we have today, whether you agree with their politics or not, that has the commitment and courage to have been a signer if they had lived in that time?

John McCain comes first to my mind. Who else? Feel free to name any state-level politicians who may not yet have national recognition. Out of 300 million citizens, we only need about 321 (60% of 535) to ensure that our 234-year-old freedom effort continues. 

Report this comment
#2) On July 04, 2010 at 12:36 PM, cthomas1017 (98.39) wrote:

Being one of the Keating Five negates him as one who would qualify as having the commitment and courage to have been a signer.  I hold Senator MCCain in honor for his service to the country, but since half way through his first term in the Senate, it's been all about McCain.

I can think of a few modern day patriots that have served in the US Congress.  Former Rep Clyde Holloway, who served in the late 80's, is one who comes to mind. 

Report this comment
#3) On July 04, 2010 at 4:21 PM, PainterPoker (24.82) wrote:

Russ Feingold

Report this comment
#4) On July 22, 2010 at 12:34 PM, PainterPoker (24.82) wrote:

Russ Feingold! 

In 1999, Feingold voted against repealing the Depression-era safeguards put in place to protect businesses, investors, and consumers.  In 2008, Feingold voted against the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and in 2009 voted against authorizing more funding for TARP. 

 The only senator to vote against the war in Iraq.  He's the man.

Report this comment
#5) On July 24, 2010 at 1:48 AM, mikwilly (31.27) wrote:

Michelle Bachman - not a man - but one willing stand up and fight for the constitution no matter what spite she will receive from her naysayers.

Report this comment
#6) On November 22, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Mary953 (84.17) wrote:

Bravo, It is almost Thanksgiving now, and I missed seeing this until now.  I hope you will find your way to a blog that I put up today.  You are one of those that I had in mind when posting it.  Have a Blessed Day!

Report this comment
#7) On February 16, 2011 at 11:04 PM, GreenCollegeGrad (74.81) wrote:

Bravo if you so happen to read this please stop by my blog. Am putting together a collaboration of the top CAPS members in an effort to help the average fellow both in real life investing and in caps.



Report this comment
#8) On September 28, 2013 at 4:09 AM, portefeuille2 (99.40) wrote:

finally ;)


Report this comment
#9) On November 11, 2013 at 4:48 PM, portefeuille (98.82) wrote:

grrrrrr ...

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners