Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

The final fleecing, and then goodbye.

Recs

5

April 23, 2008 – Comments (4)

When the war in Iraq started, a gallon of gasoline was about $1.35. Average (informal result based on googling the phrase "2007 average gasoline price" and reading the headlines talking about monthly changes) gasoline at the pumps in 2007 spent most of the year in the neighborhood of $3.25. Already in 2008 the price has risen to a shade under $4.00 and noone doubts it will pass $4.00, and could easily get to $4.50. The home ATM is shut off, so Americans will be cutting back on unneccessary spending. Equally dependent on American consumption, are the oil companys for sales and earnings. In 2001 (the most recent year I could find figures for easily enough for this paranoid rant) Americans consumed 105 billion gallons of gasoline. As American incomes have not risen since 2001, and many Americans have already given up luxury spending like health insurance, where are they gong to find the money to buy the gasoline they need to get to work.

If 105 billion gallons of gasoline increase by $1.50 each it will consume the entire $160 billion tax rebate plan and redistribute that wealth to the oil producers.

$160 billion should tide the oil producers over nicely as emerging markets replace declining US consumption.

Congratulations Dick, you win. 

4 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On April 23, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Gemini846 (48.98) wrote:

Sigh, another socialist who has no idea how microeconomics and macroeconomics are entertwined. Thanks for repeating the same drivel about some Iraq conspiracy that I can read on myspace. Perhaps buying shares in oil companies can help you offset this inflation?

Report this comment
#2) On April 23, 2008 at 11:05 AM, TMFRik (99.58) wrote:

Call it a conspiracy, call it the truth. The veteran living under a bridge can't eat macroeconomics.

Report this comment
#3) On April 23, 2008 at 11:45 AM, devoish (98.26) wrote:

Gemini,

I merely acknowledge that some other capitalist than myself used the resources available to him to take my money. Bet he's taking yours too.

Thanks for the reply.

Report this comment
#4) On April 23, 2008 at 11:56 AM, leohaas (31.56) wrote:

Gemini, you may want to keep in mind that a significant portion of the $160B devoish is referring to is propping up some shady (to say the least) regimes. How much of that money will be funelled to the terrorists?

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement