Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

alstry (35.03)

The Gardner Brothers Should Be Fired

Recs

10

December 04, 2011 – Comments (7)

And anyone else recommending anyone to invest in organizations knowingly and intentionally concealing information from shareholders and those that bailed them out.

Unless the Gardner Brothers issues a warning about their advice....they are no better than the liars they are advising their readers to invest in.....

Secrets of the Bailout, Now Revealed

But my guess is the Gardner Brothers are too chicken to really Educate, Amuse, and Enrich their readers and subcribers.....

7 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On December 04, 2011 at 9:25 PM, alstry (35.03) wrote:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/04/business/secrets-of-the-bailout-now-revealed.html?ref=business

Report this comment
#2) On December 04, 2011 at 9:25 PM, alstry (35.03) wrote:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/04/business/secrets-of-the-bailout-now-revealed.html?ref=business

Report this comment
#3) On December 04, 2011 at 9:43 PM, ElCid16 (98.07) wrote:

You missed their biggest flaw of all - allowing you to continue plaguing CAPS.

Report this comment
#4) On December 04, 2011 at 9:53 PM, alstry (35.03) wrote:

No...the Gardner Brothers are intelligent enough to appreciate the role of a Fool.

It's what keeps the King informed about the issues he really must understand.

Report this comment
#5) On December 05, 2011 at 3:06 PM, leohaas (35.73) wrote:

Whoever owns the majority of a company never gets fired from that company!

Report this comment
#6) On December 05, 2011 at 3:23 PM, TSIF (99.96) wrote:

The role of a Fool is to amuse the king.  A good Fool knows how to do that and keep his head.

At any rate in this example, a warning comes with any investment advice ever given by the Fools.  Diversify and do your own DD.  Or put it all in your mattress if that's what lets you sleep better at night.  Sometimes, however, the mattress can become so lumpy that the mattress owner doesn't get enough sleep and he becomes a disgruntled, bitter, cranky Fool who thinks the answer to everything is to make sure everyone else has a lumpy mattress.....misery loves company.

Report this comment
#7) On December 05, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Varchild2008 (84.64) wrote:

I'm beginning to *tire* and get deeply *bored* though of the same useless junk getting spit out by Motley Fool authors.

It's the same headlines....same article.....regurgitated multiple times in a row.... Containing NO USEFUL SPECIFICS.....

I don't mind, in fact greatly appreciate it, if someone wants to take the contrarian position versus my position on a stock or investment.

What angers/upsets me.....is when that contrarian position amounts to extremely out-of-date info. and generalities.....ZERO specifics...

Saying my stock is set to "plunge" cause there are competitors is really useless to me...

http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2011/12/05/why-betting-on-apple-or-microsoft-to-win-the-tv-wa.aspx

The above article is what I consider to be the type of articles we should be getting on "Motley Fool."

Instead we are inundated with useless "Throw This Stock Away" and "2 star stock poised to plunge" articles that clearly tell you nothing about your stock....nothing useful if anything at all....

nothing...

It is pathetic....  Say something that would spark interest and conversation or don't say it...

And then we have the countless articles that Cherry Pick a certain number of statistics and then declare  stock is Garbage based off of the cherry picking expedition.

Those articles get me real steamed up....  STOP THE CHERRY PICKING......CHOOSING  OP Margins  >  Net Margins   is pure silliness!!!!     Or choosing REVENUE >  CASH FLOW....

Huh????

And then not explaining anything about these ludicrous charts....

They basically come up with make believe

PEG .75 or less = GREAT!       oh...too bad....your stock's PEG is .81,,, That's a FAIL!!!!!!

Huh???

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement