Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

MrPecuniam (52.92)

The Green Glow of Uranium

Recs

8

August 31, 2011 – Comments (10) | RELATED TICKERS: CCJ , HTHXF.DL

The Green Glow of Uranium

The event that caused a rapid decline in Uranium prices caused by Fukushima may be at an end. The act that may have indicated that it is time to move on was shown in the subtle form when industry leader Cameco Corp (NYSE:CCJ) ended talks with Hathor Exploration Limited (TSE:HAT) about a possible takeover and its intention to make a hostile bid of $3.75 a share (a premium of around 40% per share).

The interesting aspect is that at the time of the Fukushima meltdown the price of Hathor was around the $3.30 mark, effectively making the Cameco offer look more opportunistic before the uranium price rises again. Maybe this is the signal that the uranium prices have bottomed out at around the $50 area. The fact that Germany intends to end its nuclear problems as well is not a very interesting prospect to when you look at Chinas intent to increase its consumption of the fuel through building 60 new reactors in the coming ten years. Cameco even states the following:

“Reports from China indicate the country plans to increase its nuclear capacity from the current 9 gigawatts (GW) to at least 70 GW by 2020. A further increase to 120-160 GW or more is planned by 2030.”

 

The greatest thing about this is that we haven’t even taken into account for India and its potential growth.

 

The next thing to consider is that the US- Russia HEU agreement will end in 2013. This agreement relates to the dismantling of Nuclear bombs of which this enriched uranium actually used for nuclear energy. Considering that the world consumed 180 million pounds of uranium in 2010 when production through mines was only 140 million pounds you can start to see the factors of supply and demand come into play. Other factors that need to be considered is the lack of any significant Uranium mines made in the last ten years.

 

But lets look at the facts. Currently Cameco is looking at producing an annual output of 40 million lbs of U3O8 by 2018, and considering that in 2010 it produced 22.8 million lbs, that is equal to a 75% output increase.  That is impressive growth coming from the largest Uranium producer in the world.

 

Considering that this is a mining company and not a company like Coca Cola we need to look at valuation a bit differently. Considering that the P/E for Cameco during the last major Uranium spike was 61.7 and that in 2008 it was 16.6 at its lowest, the current P/E of 20 makes it a reasonable buy.

 

Debt to equity stands at 0.20, and Caecos record of maintaining this ratio over the past ten years shows relative stability. Also looking at the Price/ Book at 1.9, again we see that during the previous peak it was at 6, emphasizes the possible price shift we can see when the supply and demand factors come into play on the uranium prices. Cammeco is currently seeing a negative cashflow for the first time in the past ten years, this comes mainly from recent events as well as its current efforts in developing additional mines. The ROE has also been between 10% and 15%. In fact in 2009 it saw a ROE of 26.3% due to increased uranium prices so again we need to take into account of higher uranium prices in the future.

The PEG ratio is currently at 0.4. And this is where the gem and I believe true potential of Cameco shows since its true value lies in its growth.

 

Furthermore based on the DCF the value of CCJ is around the $59 mark, giving investors a margin of safety of around 60%.

 

 

*Note: Hathor owns territories in the Athebasca Basin near Cameco, and is possibly exploring building its own mines instead of selling towards Cammeco due to existing infrastructure in the region. However that’s an entirely different and very interesting story and I would encourage you to look into if you like Cameco and enjoy taking a risk in a potential future major developer.

 

 

*Authors note - I currently have long positions in both CCJ and HAT

10 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On August 31, 2011 at 5:05 PM, BillyTG (90.48) wrote:

Good stuff. It has nowhere to go, but up, right? Let's hope so!

Report this comment
#2) On September 03, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Frankydontfailme (21.71) wrote:

How about the developing company U308?

Report this comment
#3) On September 03, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Frankydontfailme (21.71) wrote:

I've been thinking about uranium and it sounds appealing. However, looking at the long-term chart, I worry that it's too cyclical. With China's rate of growth decreasing, I'm not sure the demand will be there until the world's economy's bottom out.

If it gets much lower though...

Do you have an opinion on CCJ in light of them hedging (upside limited?) 

Report this comment
#4) On September 07, 2011 at 4:45 PM, MrPecuniam (52.92) wrote:

Well the thing is CCJ can takeover hathor on the free cash they have. I own CCJ as well. The main factor that will determine the growth in china will be cheap energy. Before a nuclear plant can be built in China the developers must have a fixed contract/uranium source for the next ten years. In other words before they can build they need to have a supplier. The closer the plants come towards physical development phase the more demand will come. So basically CCJ already has a pretty decent set of uranium contracts. Even though china might be facing short term problems I think that China will continue to look at their long term investments.

This long term vission is seen through their current trading policies with regards with cheap and easy accessible precius metals. Recently in an article about the precious metal tantalum (used for computers and phones and the like), china has already secured around 60% of the world supply that is produced yearly.  (world demand of the metal is 140 tons a year while output is only 100 tons and the reserves are running on empty).

 I truely believe that china is doing its best to avoid long term disruptions in ther precious metals stream. That includes Uranium. China is planning for the world after this dipression is behind us so they emerge on top. I know that statement may sound strange but one just needs to look at the moves they are making.

I would recomend reading the Fat Tail by Ian Bremmer. Its all about political knowledge for strategic investing. Its a short book, easy to read but its a nice eye opener.

CCJ for me is therefore my strategic bet for the future. CCJ and SLW are my favorite stocks at the moment.

Report this comment
#5) On September 07, 2011 at 4:59 PM, mhy729 (29.53) wrote:

What are your thoughts on DNN or the [ETF] NLR?  Nobody likes paying fees on ETFs, but you do get alleviation of company-specific risks.  I've been watching nuclear stocks for some time now.

Good post, thanks for sharing! 

Report this comment
#6) On September 07, 2011 at 5:02 PM, BillyTG (90.48) wrote:

Sprott says sell your uranium. I still have uranium miners and am debating whether to continue holding them or cutting my losses for tax purposes since I've had such a great year on PMs. As attached as I can get to my holdings, especially when I believe in the story (Uranium really will have its day when we get into a tight energy crunch!), I have to weigh the returns. The bottom line is that there are other investments I can make that will have greater returns. Eventually uranium will go on another tear, and then I can buy back in.

Report this comment
#7) On September 07, 2011 at 5:16 PM, mhy729 (29.53) wrote:

Slightly misleading headline on that article, but a good read, and I'm sure the featured portfolio manager is quite competent to have secured a position at SAM (certainly looks very young).  I guess I'll just keep this as a CAPS play, and continue exploring whether to get in IRL.  Thanks for posting BillyTG!

Report this comment
#8) On September 07, 2011 at 5:29 PM, BillyTG (90.48) wrote:

Yes, my holdings are real and I've had them since around 2004 or 2005! I've seen them run wayyy up, then wayyy down, then way up in the past year, only to crash again with Japan's nuclear disaster. Most of them were in positive territory, some very much so, in the first quarter of this year. Now I have losses again:((( There will be a time to buy in, maybe next year, but you're probably better off holding cash or looking/waiting for better returning, safer opportunities right now, IMO. 

Report this comment
#9) On September 08, 2011 at 3:09 AM, MrPecuniam (52.92) wrote:

well I have SAM as well, However I do believe that the article you are refering too was at that time relevant. However CCJs bid for Hathor is a major buy signal in my eyes. Doing a DCF analysis of CCJ says the stock is worth at least $57. Im not saying put your life savings into this company, but I wouldn't dismiss it from my portfolio entirely. After all CCJ can get abit cheaper. I have been lucky with CCj in the sense that I bought it before uranium went high, but only ended up losing my profits I made there. Any losses I did make have been recouped through Hathor.

With regards to natgas, I gotta say that those stocks have perfomed horribly over the last few months. However that again is a story in its own. 

 

With regards to DNN and NLR, I have not looked into the companies yet. The main reason why I have hathor was because of their positioning so close to CCJ and roughrider deposit. 

Report this comment
#10) On September 08, 2011 at 9:01 PM, mhy729 (29.53) wrote:

Oops, I made an error in that comment re: DNN and NLR.  I meant to say URA instead of NLR.  URA is an ETF composed of uranium producers and explorers, while NLR is an ETF composed of companies involved in the nuclear power industry including uranium producers.

Also, I've been thinking about the difference in potential between uranium stocks such as CCJ and DNN, and other nuclear-related stocks exclusive of uranium producers, but will need to do some more reading/research to make any conclusions that might be worthwhile to share here. 

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement