Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

dexion10 (28.21)

The next big trade

Recs

18

February 24, 2009 – Comments (16) | RELATED TICKERS: SPY , UWM , FXP

The traders text book says the next trade is to buy the market down here around S&P 740. I've dipped my toe into a few longs. But I will not be making any big long bets for four reasons:

===========================================

 FOUR REASONS I CAN NOT GET BULLISH

-not even for a quick trade off the recent lows

===========================================

1. I don't like trading - I like investing and there are very few stocks that have good earnings visibility or balance sheet visibility (future interest rates on legacy debt).

2. It is still easy to find stocks that won't work (Sunoco, Toyota, Humana, Netsuite, etc), but very hard to find stocks that will work with reduced global consumption and decreased employment.

3. I do not believe the stock market or the economy can turn until governments of the world address consumer balance sheet issues. The consumer doesn't appear to have enough buying power to stimulate the economy and until the consumer recieves some give aways or benefits from inflation reduced debts I do not believe the economy or stock market can recover.

4. I am leary of the anticipated technical retest of the S&P 500, because EVERYONE is expecting a rally off the november lows (which we almost hit today).  I don't like how popular the trade has become and I am worried that the small cap indexes still need to catch up.

====================

Here is what I did today:

====================

Instead I've covered most of my shorts and hedged my remaining shorts with some a long biased 2X ETF (UWM) and I'll buy a a high BETA stock (CVI) that might rally 30% -50% with all the other low quality, crappy stocks that always outperform off a market bottom. 

I've concentrated my short exposure to the most conservative highest probability short that I have... Toyota Motors (TM). I do not believe that Toyota can recover until there is a solution in place for consumers in the USA and Europe.  Saving the banks won't save Toyota... at some point we have to improve the buying power of consumers and so far no soultion is on the horizon.

That's it though- that is as bullish as Dexion10 can get in the middle of a bear market.  While I'd like to think that the market is cheap because it is down 50% from it's highs a year ago... the truth is the market doesn't HAVE to stop going down.

BEFORE YOU GET GIDDY AND BUY STOCKS REMEMBER THIS:

 In 1930 the market had fallen 60% from it's 1929 highs. From the end of 1930 thru January 1931 the market rallied 30%.  It then fell another 66% from 1931 - 1932. The total loss was

 ===========================================

THE BIG ISSUES KNOW ONE IS TALKING ABOUT: 

 ===========================================

1. Aggregate consumption is impaired by impaired consumer balance sheets

   - implication - consumers will not get easy credit again so aggregate consumption is impaired until consumers debts shrink relative to their earning power. We need wage inflation or asset inflation. 

   -  Further implications: China / Asia can not lead the world out of this mess because there primary end market is the US consumer... so asian strength is a fantasy!

2. Company profit margins are going to revert to historical levels or below historic averages

    - implication if you see a company with 10x trailing earnings and their profit margins are falling 50% while their sales are falling 10%. The forward PE is over 20 X earnings (not cheap).

=========================================== 

That is it people!

- I'll turn bullish real quick when I see a solution for the consumer on the horizon.

I believe the winning trade is still to short rallies for severy more months or years. The bottom line is that you can not get bullish on stocks until the consumer balance sheet has improved.

One of the biggest problems for the stock market and the economy is that the middle class consumer and the upper middle class consumer is impaired and so aggregate demand and discretionary income is under huge pressure.   Worse - even if we create 20 trillion dollars (exagerated) and give it the banks we still won't have much more loan demand (money creation) or consumption demand.

16 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On February 24, 2009 at 9:07 AM, dexion10 (28.21) wrote:

sorry that heading should read:

THE BIG ISSUES NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT:

Report this comment
#2) On February 24, 2009 at 9:12 AM, arboretum (29.37) wrote:

Thanks for the post!

 I agree with everything you say above. But... what if the talk of 1930s depression turns out to be overblown, and by the late summer unemployment is starting to fall? Seems unlikely now maybe, but if that happens might /this/ bottom be /the/ bottom? 

As for companies with transparent earnings and good prospects, how about energy and the tech stars like GOOG and IBM?

Report this comment
#3) On February 24, 2009 at 9:54 AM, dexion10 (28.21) wrote:

arboretum

 

GOOG - is basically an advertising company 

IBM - is a disaster waiting to happen - they have a huge pension plan and the consulting biz and outsourced staffing will certainly come under pressure... HPQ and IBM mgt are studs that are going to become duds.

energy is perhaps interesting over the mid-term  but even that is questionable because the price of nat gas can fall for the mid term because so much cheap gas has been found. 

Oil is interesting but desparate emerging market producers concern me - will they have any discipline.

 

If I had to take a shot over the mid term energy would be a spot I'd be interested in but I'd have to own a low cost producer like UPL

Report this comment
#4) On February 24, 2009 at 10:21 AM, jstegma (30.16) wrote:

Very good post.  I agree totally that some sort of inflation is needed to right the balance sheets.

Report this comment
#5) On February 24, 2009 at 11:27 AM, dexion10 (28.21) wrote:

jstegma - thanks for the comment and congrats on your very high CAPS rating of 99.78  - I am in envy.

 

  arboretum- thanks again for your comments too! I will keep an eye on  your lofty CAPs score as well! 

My biggest caution for you (arboretum) is that price is a weird variable and it there is no natural price for anything - it is always a function of money supply. So we are in a dangerous place... credit was/is money... so the lack of credit changes prices for everything unless we create more credit or more money.

Report this comment
#6) On February 24, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Tastylunch (30.02) wrote:

We are aligned 100% on this Dex.

the problems show no true signs of abating

about the sector that has signs of life looks like some restaurants surprisingly

Like the high beta idea a lot, Airlines and other volatile names have the chance to run 50-100% in their channel or so

Report this comment
#7) On February 24, 2009 at 12:34 PM, dexion10 (28.21) wrote:

my big questions today are:

 

1. will we rally from 740 or 720 or 700.

2. Will we get a month end window dressing rally (normally we would - we've had one every month except Jan (after the santa clause rally took the market from fairliy valued to EXPENSIVE).

 

I can't dispute that we are technically oversold and that the number of stocks below their 100 day moving averages is close to what we've seen at past bottoms(about 82% vs high 80s low 90s in the past).

but I am disturbed that the Russell 2000 is no where near retesting it's lows it is about 7% higher than it's lows and "good stocks" have not been severely punished YET.

so I worry that the 740 retest trade will fail.

 

 

Report this comment
#8) On February 24, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Tastylunch (30.02) wrote:

I think it entirely depends on Obama/Bernanke

they keep spooking the market, Bernanke just did again

My guess is it won't be 740, beyond that I don't know.

Report this comment
#9) On February 24, 2009 at 4:36 PM, dexion10 (28.21) wrote:

Tastylunch - great to hear from you as always!

I often refer to that great "Great Depression" chart you put in your "dogpiling" blog... I highly recommend everyone check out that chart and blog if you have not yet!  here is the link

 

 

Report this comment
#10) On February 25, 2009 at 7:45 AM, dexion10 (28.21) wrote:

The guy who will turn me bullish is going to be Bernanke.

 

The magic of the Federal Reserves inflation creating machine is the key to the "recovery".  

The Treasury can not borrow enough to fix these problems and Treasury's borrowing guarantees higher taxes in the future.... 

If I had to choose between higher taxes and high debt vs. less dollar buying power (the treasury fix)

VS.

wage inflation and normal debt loads, and less tax hikes...

I'd take the dollar infation because I am a working person... if I was retired I'd want the treasury fix.

Report this comment
#11) On February 25, 2009 at 12:59 PM, anchak (99.85) wrote:

Dex...I couldn't agree more with your last comment. Infact this is the same battle across the globe - where respective Federal Banks are choosing to pump in money - to create enough available pool of dollars to reinflate.

Given this global effort - it would be interesting how this plays out in the relative currency valuation - when all is done

Report this comment
#12) On February 25, 2009 at 5:15 PM, VIS46 (< 20) wrote:

Dex:

I did not see TM& CVI in your caps.Is there any reason?I like your post very much.It is reasonable to assume TM will have tough time to sell the cars in this environment.

Report this comment
#13) On February 26, 2009 at 10:51 AM, dexion10 (28.21) wrote:

VIS46:  the difference between shorting in CAPS and the real world is that in the real world I only care about absolute profit from a short in CAPS i have to make a market wide call and judge shorts relative to the market.

TM is a high probability trade but I'd rather put it on when I feel toyota is poised to underperform the market immediately... so I am waiting to add it back to my CAPS.

 

As for CVI I should have added it to CAPS around  $4.20 or lower - that was an oversight... at the current price I can't add it... additionally the end of month rally may end very quickly and crappy stocks like CVI will get hammered then.

I'm not sure the gains will last 7 days (they may) but CAPS makes you hold for 7 days.  

I may add CVI ahead of their earnings announcement if the stock sells off

 

 

Report this comment
#14) On February 26, 2009 at 1:53 PM, VIS46 (< 20) wrote:

Dex:

Thanks very much for your insight into  CAPS world and real world.I value your judgement and shorted TM already and making money.

Report this comment
#15) On March 03, 2009 at 3:23 PM, usmilitiadude (66.21) wrote:

Inflation equals stealing if it is driven monetarily and not through natural supply and demand.

Report this comment
#16) On March 05, 2009 at 9:26 AM, dexion10 (28.21) wrote:

usmilitiadude - there is no natural inflation.

if the money supply didn't grow we'd have a zero sum game. For some assets to go up others wouild HAVE to go down. 

In fact population growth paired with a flat money supply would mean constant deflation because over time everyone would have less and less money per person.

Did you honestly think that there was a natural way to have inflation  - the system has always been imbalanced  and a bit absurd.  You can't make it "natural"

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement