Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

The sum of its parts is greater than the whole

Recs

11

February 24, 2009 – Comments (3) | RELATED TICKERS: L , BWP , DO

 

I've had my eye on Loews Corp. (L) for a while now, as one might be able to tell from my miserable -14 CAPS score on the stock.  Not to be confused with the Home Depot-like home improvement retailer, Loews Corp is large conglomerate that has operations in a number of sectors.  I've always believed that the company is like a mini-Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-B).  While the Tisch family is certainly not Warren Buffett, Loews trades at a substantial enough discount to Berkshire to make up for a lot of the difference.

Given the company's miserable performance lately, I am happy to report that I never pulled the trigger on it in real life.  Its substantial investment in an troubled insurance company called CNA Financial (CNA) has always bothered me.  However, Loews' stock is so cheap now that it is becoming very interesting.  Certainly interesting enough for me to give it the old thumbs up in CAPS if I wasn't already sitting on a negative score for it.

How cheap is Loews?  Check out the following sum-of-the-parts analysis that was published in this week's Barron's:

242 million shares in CNA Financial (CNA) is worth approximately $5.00 per Lowes share

$1,250 million in CNA preferred stock: $3.22/share

70 million shares of Diamond Offshore (DO):  $9.97/share

130 million shares of Boardwalk Pipeline (BWP): $5.97/share

$500 million in the Boardwalk GP: $1.15/share

$700 million in Loews Hotels: $1.61/share

$1,750 million in Highmount Exploration: $4.02/share (natural gas producer)

$1,400 million in net cash: $2.87/share

TOTAL SUM-OF-PARTS:  $33.81/share

Current stock price:  $20.21/share

Discount:  $13.60/share

As you can see L is trading at a significant discount to the current value of its holdings, even if you hate CNA, which traditionally has been the worst of breed in terms of insurance companies, and mark Loews' investment in it down to zero, L is still trading at over five dollars less than the current value of its parts.  That's a heck of a deal.

Add to this the fact that the company actually pays a dividend, its yield of slightly over 1% isn't great...but it's something, and a compelling case can be made for the stock at this level.  As I have mentioned numerous times in recent months, I personally am staying away from common stock right now and am putting any money that I invest in preferred stock or bonds that have decent yields.  I am sticking with this philosophy with my real portfolio, but I am definitely staying long L in CAPS.

Deej

3 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On February 24, 2009 at 2:30 PM, TMFDeej (99.26) wrote:

Here's my new and improved article on Loews Corp., now featuring the correct spelling of the company's name :).

Deej

Report this comment
#2) On February 24, 2009 at 2:48 PM, DemonDoug (34.04) wrote:

Loews did investors a huge favor by spinning off Lorillard, so we could get to the tobacco selling part of the company without having to buy all the crap financial stuff.

I'd but LO before L.

Report this comment
#3) On February 24, 2009 at 2:53 PM, DemonDoug (34.04) wrote:

buy*, not but

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement