Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

colonelnelson (95.67)

This Turkey is Cooked--Attempt #1 at CAPS usefulness

Recs

24

June 22, 2008 – Comments (25) | RELATED TICKERS: TKF

As I have admitted in my early entries, I am not a financial expert or an economist, and I have struggled with the question of what I can meaningfully contribute to the discussions on these boards.  Then it occurred to me this weekend that perhaps my background and study in political science might provide some insight to the CAPS community and permit others--cleverer persons than I--to benefit from my knowledge and experience of these subjects.  Therefore, witness my first attempt at CAPS usefulness: a brief thesis on trouble developing in Turkey

Thesis

Turkey’s constitutional court is poised to ban Turkey’s ruling party; a decision which will significantly set back Turkey’s economy and the businesses which operate in the country.  Therefore, it appears to be a good time to short securities that have benefited from the relative stability of Turkey’s current government and the country’s emerging economy over the last six years.

 History, Premises and Assumptions: 

Turkey’s constitutional court is on the verge of banning Turkey’s ruling party, including President Abdullah Gul and Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan.  This ruling party is the Justice and Development Party (the AKP), which came to power in 2002.  After five years in power, the AKP narrowly won re-election last year with a slim plurality, only 47% of the vote. 

The AKP and Preisdent Gul have had a very positive six year record of economic and political reform.  Though not without controversy, the AKP government has granted increasing rights to women and substantially furthered membership talks with the European Union.  Clearly, if Turkey is permitted to join the European Union, Turkey’s economy will greatly benefit, as will Turkish business.  But even without the immediate benefit of EU membership, the AKP and its leaders have been very positive for development in Turkey over the last six years.

The recent trouble arises because a cornerstone of Turkey’s constitution is strict government secularism—that is, the separation of church and state.  Turkey’s constitutional court, which is a heavily partisan body, has a history of declaring laws and political parties unconstitutional.  In fact, the AKP was formed from two Islamist parties which were previously banned for unconstitutional anti-secularism.

This February, the constitutional court overturned a law passed by the AKP, which permitted women to wear Islamic head scarves at university.  The court’s rationale in reaching this decision has set the stage for a pending determination (perhaps as early as July) regarding the constitutionality of the AKP itself.  The court held in its recent decision that the AKP is “the focal point of anti-secular activities.”  This is a very strong indication that the court will ultimatley find that the AKP is unconstitutionally anti-secular, and ban the party outright.

Turkey’s economy is already fragile.  The loss of the tenuous central control exerted by Turkey’s ruling AKP party would be disastrous to the progress Turkey has made over the last six years.  The AKP represents the growing Turkish middle class, especially Turkey’s Kurds, while the old secular parties who stand to gain from the AKP’s ouster represent the old, dwindling Turkish elite.  This is important because...

If the AKP is declared unconstitutional, which at this point appears almost certain, opponents of Turkey’s admittance into the EU will have gained a substantial victory, and economic progress in Turkey will be set back substantially.  Perhaps more concerning, Turkey’s military, which has designs on further operations against the Kurds of Northern Iraq, will gain further power and support for their military operations there if the AKP is declared unconstitutional.  Finally, the relative stability of the last six years will be lost, to the peril of Turkish business.

Conclusion: 

All indications point to the conclusion that the AKP will be banned as unconstitutional.  When this happens, I believe that investors will rush to sell off their stakes in Turkish business.  I am therefore recommending shorting on Turkish-based investments, such as the Turkish Investment Fund (TKF) and iShares MSCI Turkey Investment Fund (TUR).

 

More information / Sources: 

The Economist, A tragedy in the making, The Economist, June 14-20, 2008 (pp. 16-17).

http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/06/22/opinion/edcohen.php?page=1

http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/english/domestic/9230063.asp?scr=1

http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/english/domestic/9212990.asp

http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/english/domestic/9238707.asp?scr=1

http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/english/domestic/9238707.asp?scr=1

25 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On June 22, 2008 at 2:26 PM, TDRH (99.92) wrote:

Mustapha Kemal is probably turning over in his grave.

Report this comment
#2) On June 22, 2008 at 2:48 PM, FleaBagger (98.34) wrote:

One thing: not that I think it is likely or even possible for Turkey, but extreme market freedom (a la 19th century England and US or modern-day Singapore) would be far better for the Turkish economy than joining the EU (which would necessarily limit market freedom).

Good article, though. I don't invest in Turkey (as far as I know), but that is good stuff to know.

Report this comment
#3) On June 22, 2008 at 3:35 PM, TheGarcipian (88.17) wrote:

Thanks, colonel, for the good info. I have been too focused on US-related problems that I had not known about this impending crisis until you brought it up. Like FleaBagger, I don't invest in Turkey, and only very rarely short stocks, but I sincerely hope that Turkey does not slide backwards in its economic expansion. It is such a pity that Man is so short-term focused, and Turkey doesn't seem any less free of that terrible human fault...

Report this comment
#4) On June 22, 2008 at 8:00 PM, EScroogeJr (< 20) wrote:

Thanks for the update, colonel. But really, I can't see your point. Isn't strict government secularism a good thing? As for me, I would much rather invest in a country whose government is not talking to god. I don't quite see how a party of religious lunatics should be  regarded as a fundamental pillar of stability.

Report this comment
#5) On June 22, 2008 at 9:02 PM, wolfhounds (29.30) wrote:

Excellent piece, well thought out and written. Not that I would invest in a country caught between old and new, but certain companies are well thought of in U.S. investment circles. Turkcell comes to mind. Think I'll heed your advise and just stay away.

Report this comment
#6) On June 22, 2008 at 10:54 PM, colonelnelson (95.67) wrote:

EScroogeJr wrote: But really, I can't see your point.

The point is that under the relative stability of the AKP government, business in Turkey has thrived.  Turkey's economic situation has improved to the point where full membership in the EU (for better or worse, as FleaBagger has noted) is actually a real possibility.

My comment is that the Turkish constitutional court has indicated that they believe the AKP is the focus of anti-secular activities in the country.  If they rule as they have indicated they will, the government will be dissolved, and the country will face a serious crisis that will undermine economic progress. 

Therefore, I am suggesting that Turkish-based investment should either be avoided or exploited.

EScroogeJr wrote:  As for me, I would much rather invest in a country whose government is not talking to god.  Isn't strict government secularism a good thing?

It depends on your values and personal beliefs.  In Turkey, the practical effect of this strict secularism is that the constitutional court stifles individual religious freedoms.  For example, it is illegal to wear the traditional muslim headscarf in both government and public universities and schools.

EScroogeJr wrote:  I don't quite see how a party of religious lunatics should be regarded as a fundamental pillar of stability.

Perhaps they aren't a fundamental pillar of stability (hillarious play on words, by the way) , but since 2002 the AKP has successfully established an environment for business to grow and prosper in Turkey.  It is undeniable that were elected and later re-elected as part of a legitimate democratic process.

Finally, be careful not to confuse a political party with Islamic roots (such as the AKP) with the radical, lunatic fringe, such as the Taliban.  The AKP are no more lunatics than the devotees of any major religion--although personal opinion on this subject will vary substantially.

 

Report this comment
#7) On June 22, 2008 at 11:47 PM, EScroogeJr (< 20) wrote:

"For example, it is illegal to wear the traditional muslim headscarf in both government and public universities and schools. "

So what? It should be illegal.

"My comment is that the Turkish constitutional court has indicated that they believe the AKP is the focus of anti-secular activities in the country.  If they rule as they have indicated they will, the government will be dissolved, and the country will face a serious crisis that will undermine economic progress. "

If a party is engaged in anti-secular activities, I say, to hell with this party. Economic progress will be much safer without them. To think what America would be like without separation of church and state...

"The AKP are no more lunatics than the devotees of any major religion"

How can one be a devotee of a religion and not a lunatic? 

Report this comment
#8) On June 23, 2008 at 3:15 PM, TMFDeej (99.36) wrote:

Great post, colonel.  I love how you are relating your expertise in an area to the investment world.  I had a fairly large position in Turkcell (TKC) last year that I did really well on, but all of this turmoil in Turkey spooked me into selling 3/4 of it several months ago.

I look forward to reading more posts from you about international politics.  One never knows what gem they might uncover by studying this area.  The seeds that turned into the monsterous growth that China and India are experiencing today were planted in the world of politics.

Deej

Long TKC, but not nearly as long as I used to be

Report this comment
#9) On June 24, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Nainara (< 20) wrote:

How fascinating. The internal politics of Turkey are completely off my radar. I wonder which political parties and platforms will stand to gain from the deposition of the AKP.

Report this comment
#10) On June 24, 2008 at 7:08 PM, barbil (80.66) wrote:

Great article!  But the reason I am writing is to tell you how impressed I am with your restraint in responding to EScroogeJr.

A few of his statements were not only ignorant...they were intentionally inflammatory.  He is either attempting to provoke a heated response, or he is a hopeless redneck without a clue.

Comments spouting religous and racial bias should not be a part of this great CAPS experiment. 

Perhaps I should apologize for my personal attack on his comments...  but I DO NOT apologize to him, but to the community that has to put up with reading this trivial BS.

barbil

Report this comment
#11) On June 26, 2008 at 4:33 PM, madcowmonkey (< 20) wrote:

I wanted to read this post the other day, but didn't have time and forgot. Poli sci is always relevant when it comes to investing. People that think otherwise just don't know. Dido on what Deej has already said. I will look forward to future posts. Turkey was an interesting start and you had a great title for it too. Nice.

Report this comment
#12) On June 26, 2008 at 8:24 PM, mindmuse (98.64) wrote:

This is an excellent type of contribution and the type that truly can add value to the CAPS community. Thanks.

Report this comment
#13) On June 26, 2008 at 10:14 PM, thewscott (23.77) wrote:

Great article, but I respectfully disagree about the impact to TURKCELL.
Turkey's political instability is definitely impacting the risk profile of Turkcell as an investment, but I believe the political issues are WAY overblown.  I do not believe the constitutional court will entirely dissolve the ruling AK party. But if this does occur, it will only be a temporary setback as any ruling political party will support continued economic growth, foreign investment, and domestic development.  The constitutional court will not cut off its nose to spite its face. 
As the young population (avg age is under 30) continues to migrate to densely populated urban areas, organic growth in demand for mobile telcomm services will continue. According to a UK publication, Turkish youth account for the 4th largest Facebook user community and for the largest non-english user base.  This demographic is a heavy user of Mobile services and this will continue no matter which political party runs the government

With a price-to-earnings ratio significantly lower than the projected growth rate, TKC remains a huge bargain at the current valuation.  Regardless of the government structure, TKC will continue to grow profitability as all market factors (urbanization, demographics, emerging market penetration increases, and Turkey GDP growth) are pointing in the right direction.

Report this comment
#14) On June 27, 2008 at 11:51 AM, deezerd (< 20) wrote:

Terrific post. I spent last summer working in Turkey (in both Istanbul and Bursa, teaching English) and got a crash course in Turkey's domestic politics as the AKP was re-elected that summer with an improved majority.

What I found fascinating was that the "secularists" were screaming rabidly about the "Islamists" taking over, yet those same "Islamists" were the ones who wanted to: 1) free up the economy (scrap tariffs, sell off state-owned biz etc) and 2) increase personal liberty (religious freedom, scrapping the idiotic *lese-majeste* laws against "insulting Turkishness") and other ironies too numerous to mention.

That said, I'm with thewscott -  I think the Court would be truly asking for a public-opinion boot to the teeth if it banned a democratically elected (and REelected) ruling party. I'd be very surprised if that actually happened, and still more so if they didn't reverse any such verdict at whiplash speed after the mobs began yelling for their heads.

As for TKC, it's still on my buylist. The worries you mentioned have it trading cheap, their fundamentals still look good, and their market dominance (which I've seen firsthand) is still untouched by any meaningful competition.

Keep 'em coming though, great way to get people thinking. ;D

Report this comment
#15) On June 27, 2008 at 12:06 PM, deezerd (< 20) wrote:

Oh, and one frank afterthought ... setting my logical and investment-related arguments above, I'll admit that on an emotional level ....

I really, TRULY hope you're wrong.

Because I like Turkey an awful lot, can't wait to visit again, and would be thoroughly upset if the Court turned out to be as knuckleheaded as that. The Turks deserve better.

Report this comment
#16) On June 27, 2008 at 12:26 PM, deezerd (< 20) wrote:

Oh, and one frank afterthought ... setting my logical and investment-related arguments above, I'll admit that on an emotional level ....

I really, TRULY hope you're wrong.

Because I like Turkey an awful lot, can't wait to visit again, and would be thoroughly upset if the Court turned out to be as knuckleheaded as that. The Turks deserve better.

Report this comment
#17) On June 27, 2008 at 12:59 PM, colonelnelson (95.67) wrote:

Thank you everyone for your comments and thoughts. 

I believe I will respond to thewscott and deezerd posts in a separate blog, since they deserve full consideration and discussion.  And, please, let me be clear... I wish nothing bad on Turkey.

That said, this announcement today does not bode well...

http://www.bianet.org/english/kategori/english/107915/the-european-council-reconsiders-turkeys-status

The European Council Reconsiders Turkey’s Status

Emphasizing the AKP closure case in its latest report, the European Council proposes that Turkey goes back to being monitored. The EU expert Aktar says “the reaction is not new, the relations with the EU are at the point of stalling.”  

Bia news center

27-06-2008

Erhan ÜSTÜNDAĞ

Dr. Cengiz Aktar, the European Union (EU) expert, said that the European Council which proposed that the EU should start monitoring Turkey in matters of democracy and human rights “placed Turkey in the category of banana republics.”

The report that was accepted by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) meeting at Strasbourg yesterday says that there are problems regarding the democratic operation in Turkey, pointing to the closure case against the Justice and Development Party (AKP).

Aktar said that “the European side” has been showing its discontent regarding the closure case since March 14 and now the PACE has joined this group as well.

Emphasizing that the start of the monitoring process takes time, Aktar said, “Voicing this wish itself is bad enough.”

Even if they start monitoring Turkey again, this will technically not affect the negotiations with the EU. “The relations are”, indicated Aktar, “already about to stop anyways.”    

 

Report this comment
#18) On June 29, 2008 at 11:11 AM, klemenv (99.67) wrote:

"For example, it is illegal to wear the traditional muslim headscarf in both government and public universities and schools. "

Are you sure of this? It used to be like that in the past, but if I am not mistaken, AKP has reversed that.

 

Report this comment
#19) On June 29, 2008 at 5:01 PM, C57BL6 (< 20) wrote:

I disagree with a lot of your analysis on Turkish politics, Turkish military action in Iraq, and the outcome of this constitutional court drama.  I would like to just concentrate on the 47% and its meaning though:

This quote: "After five years in power, the AKP narrowly won re-election last year with a slim plurality, only 47% of the vote" indicates you have been given poor information on what that 47% means. 

This 47% means that AKP now dominates the parliament and does not need a coalition.  Their closest competitor was CHP who got a relatively tiny 20% of the vote. 

So the party that's great for business has little real opposition to getting its policies passed.  

The only opposition that had been around was President Sezer and he has been replaced by President Gul, from AKP. 

This 47% rose from 30% in 2002.  It did so precisely because the population has had enough of the old elite (like CHP/military) trying to maintain its power.  I am guessing that nothing will come of this constitutional court and on the small chance AKP is banned they will reform and are likely to maintain their popularity and control.

Report this comment
#20) On June 29, 2008 at 10:58 PM, colonelnelson (95.67) wrote:

klemenev:  You are correct in stating that the AKP had sponsored a law which abolished the ban on wearing the Islamic headscarf at university.  However, the constitutional court struck down this law as unconstitutional, setting the stage for the current dilemma.

C57BL6:  You are quite correct in pointing out my poorly worded statement from my original post, and in fact, the AKP holds many more seats in the Turkish parliament than any other rival political party.  (According to my reading, the AKP holds 341 seats, while their next closest rival, The Republican People's Party, or CHP, holds 112.)

The concept which I failed to effectively convey was that while the AKP may "dominate the parliament," as you say, it lacks the two-thirds majority in parliament necessary to pass legislation unopposed

It is also entirely possible that nothing will come of this constitutional court case.  And it is also possible, even if the AKP is banned, that they will reform under another party. 

However, you cannot deny that this case is seriously undermining Turkey's bid to EU membership (please see the article I cited above).  It would also be difficult to ignore the concerns raised in the international press about what effect the AKP's ouster would have on the country's creditworthiness and ability to finance their widening current account deficit.

On a final note, I recently read a fascinating description of the unfolding crisis in an editorial in Today's Zaman.  The author describes this developing situation as a "Slow Motion Coup Against Turkish Democracy."

http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/yazarDetay.do?haberno=146206

Report this comment
#21) On July 01, 2008 at 7:17 AM, deezerd (< 20) wrote:

Read that column just now, and I have to admit there's a good deal of truth in his assessment of the CHP/militarist old guard and their motives.

Caveat emptor, though: that particular paper does have a penchant for the sort of florid overstatement he displayed toward the end. (E.g. any Turk soldier who dies is a "martyr", even if his ticket was punched by a drunken lunatic drag-racing a dolmus bus.) I mean, comparing old-guard Turkey to North Korea is laying it on a bit thick. ;D  

Report this comment
#22) On July 01, 2008 at 9:33 PM, TMFSinchiruna (57.02) wrote:

Hmmm... more useful than you realize.  :)  Excellent post!  I own Eldorado Gold, which has a mine in Turkey.  I know a lot of people own Newmont, but losing one mine isn't going to kill a company that huge.  I have to research how big a property it is, though.  Anyway, thanks for the info!

Turkey Mining Companies Companies from InfoMine db - InfoMine's Company and Property Database All companies with properties located in Turkey ANATOLIA MINERALS DEVELOPMENT LIMITEDELDORADO GOLD CORPORATIONNEWMONT MINING CORP ...view list of all 25 companies   Companies active in Turkey in the news NUINSCO RESOURCES LIMITEDANATOLIA MINERALS DEVELOPMENT LIMITEDINMET MINING CORPORATION

 

Report this comment
#23) On July 03, 2008 at 2:08 PM, me3tv (68.18) wrote:

Excellent post. As a novice on Turkey though - and as a student of demographics and markets, I think perhaps the issue with AKP is still up for a positive solution.  Apparently - from what I read here - the AKP is good for business but has a tendency to Islamist policy and leadership.  It seems the courts may find a solution in urging AKP to maintain its Islamist core - but put on a secular face in the government - that is - reformat the party's roll in a governing image instead of an Islamist image in national affairs.  The younger demographic is looking for business progress, I should think, regardless of Islamic or secular leanings.  Should be interesting to watch play out.  I'd have a tendency to buy TKC even in this risky environment.

Report this comment
#24) On July 04, 2008 at 5:01 PM, colonelnelson (95.67) wrote:

Thank you all for your excellent commentary and opinions.

I've written a new blog entry to bring you up to date on the latest developments--dramatic developments--in the State of Turkey.  The AKP government has struck back against their opposition with arrests and allegations of a plot against the government.

Please check out my new blog and let me know your thoughts.  You can find it here.

Jay

(a/k/a: colonelnelson) 

Report this comment
#25) On July 04, 2008 at 5:03 PM, colonelnelson (95.67) wrote:

Let me try that again:

http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=67239&t=01005285722513845772

 

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement