Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

T's Terrible Quarter

Recs

12

February 04, 2012 – Comments (5) | RELATED TICKERS: T

About 3 months ago I'd picked up some AT+T (T), largely on the strength of its 6% dividend yield.  Other things that appealed to me about the company were its relatively low debt-to-equity ratio (40%, compared to VZ's 100+%) and the prospect of a synergistic merger with T-mobile America.

You all know how that worked out.  Justice blocked the merger, causing AT+T to have to pay a $4 billion breakup fee.  I'm an AT+T shareholder; that's my money.  Or it was, before the ill-conceived plan caused AT+T management to lose it.

AT+T added 717,000 subscribers; optimistic analysts were hoping for a figure nearer 2 million.  And more than three-quarters of the smartphone activations were iPhones, for which AT+T has to hand over the lion's share of profit to Apple.

They also took a massive writedown on pension investment losses, requiring another billion to be injected to buff up the pension plan.  All in one quarter.  They had warned on this prior to the report, to be fair.

AT+T is probably not going to go out of business, but I have free leeway to put my money into any publically traded stock; this last quarter, they did not execute the way I like *my* companies to execute.  I got out with an overall 1% gain and felt lucky to do so.

The report reminded me of that GM report in 2006 where they reported a 68 billion dollar loss "because of an accounting change."  I was a GM shareholder then and remained one until a few weeks before that company reorganized in bankruptcy.  My thoughts at that time were similar to the bull case for AT+T now - it's a one-quarter fluke, the dividend is large and safe, there's only one major domestic competitor, the company is a Dog of the Dow and those historically outperform.  My thoughts on GM at that time were so catastrophically wrong that whenever I hear an echo of them today, I sell that stock immediately.

I don't know if I'd short AT+T here.  I'm not a short-side investor generally and I would be very dubious about holding a short position in T through an ex-div day.  But if they cut their dividend, look out below. 

In other news, I'm out of PPP (40% gain) and AUQ (about even) in my taxable account, not because I have changed my idea about these companies, but because I need the money for something else.  Thanks Sinchiruna! 

5 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On February 04, 2012 at 2:43 PM, awallejr (80.10) wrote:

Except T and VZ ( I own both in real life as core holdings) are more like utilities so comparing it to an auto maker isn't the same thing.  I didn't like the initial merger offer since I never thought they would get approval.  Basically the CEO threw away 4 BILLION dollars and should be canned. 

Report this comment
#2) On February 05, 2012 at 10:11 AM, blesto (31.11) wrote:

"Basically the CEO threw away 4 BILLION dollars and should be canned."

As a T shareholder I couldn't agree more. And maybe some of the other execs. It was arrogance, thinking they would barrel right through the government approval process.

Agreeing to those terms relating to if the approval didn't go through is not a negotiating achievement I'd want on my resume.

It's all about who can get their hands on the most spectrum now. T's and VZ's battles with the FCC are just getting started.

Report this comment
#3) On February 05, 2012 at 2:06 PM, JakilaTheHun (99.93) wrote:

T is definitely not GM.

It looks to me like T's management decided to take a bath.  They already had a bit of bad news, so they figured they'd get it all out in one quarter. 

I've never been a fan of the T-Mobile acquisition from AT&T's perspective.  T-Mobile knew about the anti-trust concerns, so they demanded a very large break-up fee, making the entire transaction a massive risk for AT&T. 

Still, T is essentially an oligoopolistic player in the telecom market. As said above, it's more like a utility than an automaker (which is a highly cyclical industry). 

Report this comment
#4) On February 05, 2012 at 6:19 PM, rofgile (99.00) wrote:

I was so happy that AT&T's proposal to buy T-Mobile failed.  I'm a T-Mobile customer, and I would've received a worse product if AT&T had won.  My monthly rates likely would have increased.  My service would be worse - and my tech support would be far worse.

---

That AT&T would have put such a huge penalty in their offer to buy T-Mobile showed either desperation to buy more spectrum/expand coverage/customers or hubris in their likelihood to succeed.

Either way - I hate the management of AT&T.  What they have had in their favor has been Apple and the immense growth in popularity of that company.  Whether that will sustain AT&T forever is uncertain, but it is definitely true that when someone chooses a particular smart phone they tend to stick with it with high loyalty - and contracts lock them into the mobile company.

 -Rof 

Report this comment
#5) On February 06, 2012 at 1:32 AM, ikkyu2 (99.52) wrote:

"It's more like a utility than an automaker."  I know, I keep hearing that.

Utilities can go out of business too.

I actually researched the Tokyo Electric Power Company a few years ago when Cramer was going nuts for nukes.  Maybe you've heard of that company since then.  For my part I'm just glad I didn't buy any.

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement