Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

Unintended (but predictable) Consequences

Recs

34

January 08, 2010 – Comments (9) | RELATED TICKERS: TE , PAR , TY

Public anger and outrage have a negative impact on the economy that goes BEYOND the reduction in disposable income of consumers.  Here are a few reasons to be bearish that some of the bulls may not have thought of:

1)  An increase in theft and crime.  Stores experience higher "shrinkage", which comes from both customer theft and insider graft and theft.  Hardship changes people's values.  Theft can quickly be rationalized as moral when families are worried about whether they will eat.

2) John Galtism (If you don't know who John Galt is, read Atlas Shrugged).  If people have been getting raped while jogging in the neighborhood park, are you going to choose to go running there?  By analogy, if the future business climate is uncertain and the government is lurching toward over-regulated socialism, is it rational to start or expand a business?  Is it rational to rely on obviously manipulated and bogus government statistics in order to manage a business?

3) Barter, tax avoidance and outright tax fraud.  With taxes increasing and that money going to pay Government Sachs record bonuses so that they can do "God's work," do ya think folks might do whatever they can to avoid paying taxes?  Buy from Craig's List, barter, under-report small business profits?  When people feel that politicians are not respresenting them, they can lose a sense of moral responsibility to pay taxes.  "No taxation without respresentation" applies -- let's have a tea party!  If the Secretary of the Treasury is a tax cheat, it must be ok for me!  

From the comments I'm reading in news stories all over the Internet, including populist sites like Yahoo Finance, public anger is increasing rapidly.  Read the comments here, for instance: People are Mad  And when people get angry, they can change in scary ways.  Just sayin'

 

 

9 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On January 08, 2010 at 2:22 PM, outoffocus (26.88) wrote:

I agree wholeheartedly.  We may not reach Mad Max levels but the real problems of America can only be swept under the rug but so long.  I still believe that these conditions are only temporary.  I believe we are entering one of the best times in American history to start a small business.  Its just that people must pay down debt and build savings first. Anyone still spending and not saving will be left holding the bag.

Report this comment
#2) On January 08, 2010 at 3:44 PM, ChrisGraley (99.66) wrote:

Send lawyers, guns, and money.

Report this comment
#3) On January 08, 2010 at 3:47 PM, FleaBagger (98.34) wrote:

ChrisGraley - great song.

Report this comment
#4) On January 08, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Option1307 (30.71) wrote:

I'd be curious to see some studies on the rate of crime/etc. in relation to recession/economic downturns. I'm assuming they would be relaed, but I haven't seen any papers on it specifically that I can recal. Anybody have any thoughts/ideas?

I agree that many of these things will likell increase, although, Im not sure on how much they'll increase.

Report this comment
#5) On January 09, 2010 at 11:45 AM, uclayoda87 (29.96) wrote:

April 15, 2010 will show the state and federal governments the "stimulus" effects of their work over the last two years.  I would expect with the real unemployment rate rising and small businesses being punished that tax revenues will be quite low.  So low in fact that the government may have to create a new cabinent level agency will the sole purpose to create enough spin (misinformation) to calm the US citizens and world investors.  Out of work tobacco advertising firms would be ideally suited for this job.

You don't have to look very hard to see major property crime.  Just consider how much money the US government took from its people to prop up Wall Street and send money to foreign banks.

The only politically correct business in the US these days is organized crime.  This is what happens when Chicago politics becomes the national standard of behavior.

Report this comment
#6) On January 10, 2010 at 4:25 AM, EconGrapher (< 20) wrote:

I thought the same thing Option1307  ... Are there any reliable and timely sources of information on number of and value of thefts? In harsh recessionary times it may be an interesting indicator. However there is likely to be other factors at play e.g. crime levels may be self-limiting if they activate policy responses.. and it's unlikely to be very useful in forecasting as one would expect financially motivated theft to increase after unemployment rates increase (or another proxy for financial hardship)...

Report this comment
#7) On January 10, 2010 at 4:42 AM, bluebare (60.91) wrote:

http://www.fbi.gov/research.htm

 

Report this comment
#8) On January 19, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Wh1sp (99.91) wrote:

In freakonomics the authors talk about a study which correlated the legalization of abortion with a major drop in the crime rate about 18 years later (though tortured statistics will admit to almost anything).

Report this comment
#9) On January 19, 2010 at 9:18 PM, tkell31 (< 20) wrote:

2) John Galtism (If you don't know who John Galt is, read Atlas Shrugged).  If people have been getting raped while jogging in the neighborhood park, are you going to choose to go running there?  By analogy, if the future business climate is uncertain and the government is lurching toward over-regulated socialism, is it rational to start or expand a business?  Is it rational to rely on obviously manipulated and bogus government statistics in order to manage a business?

Other then being one of the worst analogies I've ever read this has a lot of problems not the least of which is the counterpoint, should we let a few select invdividuals get incredibly wealthy while many labor for minimal wage?  Now if you just make the simple point we have way too much govt I think you have a point.

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement