April 16, 2010
– Comments (14) |
RELATED TICKERS: IBM
My thoughts on the matter. I welcome all (constructive) feedback.
Of course Goldman is and was involved with insider trading! That is a gimmie. This has been going on for years.
Thanks for your comment. I don't agree with you, but if you have evidence to support your claim, I'd be interested to take a look at it.
Hahahahahahahaha. To even ask the question is insulting. If you're not on the inside you're on the outside, and guess where WE are. If you guessed "the outside" you're right. We just pick up the crumbs that these guys throw off. But thats enough for me. If you're good at fighting for crumbs.
Im with the crumb theory.
Check this out..http://www.realzionistnews.com/ Goldman Sachs and all their buddies fit the mold.. Question is when will the other shoe drop?
I think this was the other shoe.
I'm not set either way yet, but you have to admit that it does seem likely that they were involved. Let's be honest with ourselves, they seem to always be around and/or associated with far too many sketchy situations for it to be only conincidental.
I don't agree with you, but if you have evidence to support your claim, I'd be interested to take a look at it.
Fair enough, but where is your evidence that they are not involved?
The other shoe is dropping. You folks must have missed this story - http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=376268&t=01006124249416869148&source=itxsitmot0000001&lidx=1... a must read. Look for the JPM indictments to start flying shortly. It will make the Goldman issues seem trivial. Bullion up!
Delicious, scrumptious crumbs!
Goldman had tons to do with TARP. How many former Goldman people were working for Bush and now for Obama? Does anyone wanna comment on that?
Thanks for your comment.
Proving a negative proposition is tricky (or even impossible); however, the onus of proof really isn't on me, it's on the person making the positive statement. In this case, that's SUPERMANSTOCKS.
A) probably B) politically (a big part of this whole story IMHO) it doesn't matter that much if they actually were or not....by the time it all gets sorted out finance reform will be a matter of law just like health care got thru when the insurers couldn't keep it in their pants (either) and filed for massive premium bumps at exactly the wrong time.
This time it's coming from the government's side of the net wherein w/health care it was a combination of corporate greed and really bad timing playing into the administration's hands. Now, i believe we are seeing the intentional creation of a dynamic that basically fell into their lap by luck on the prior initiative.
The learning curve for Obama & Co. grows shorter as I type this. Gotta hand it to the dude, he's learning how play the game big time:)!!!
Let me know if you want more, because there is a hell of a lot more.
http://www.zerohedge.com/node?page=1- Reports that GS had advance knowledge (big surprise) of SEC actions and "shorted themselves. Does that count? Regards.