Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

Who are the Real “Job Creators”?

Recs

12

September 04, 2012 – Comments (7)

Excellent thoughts

--------------------------------

Who are the Real “Job Creators”?
from PRAGMATIC CAPITALISM by Cullen Roche

http://pragcap.com/who-are-the-real-job-creators

Eric Cantor, the House Majority Leader, stirred up quite the controversy on Labor Day when he tweeted:

“Today, we celebrate those who have taken a risk, worked hard, built a business and earned their own success.”

Of course, Labor Day is a celebration of the worker class, not the capitalist class.  But his comments sparked a debate in some circles that has long been raging – this so-called debate about the “job creators” and who really drives job creation in the economy.  Unfortunately, the debate often falls on ideological lines as opposed to practical lines.  But this is the world we live in.  Everything is viewed in black and white when reality is usually somewhere in the middle.  This case is no different.  I’ll explain briefly.

Late last year I explained the role of the entrepreneur in the capitalist economy.  In short, the entrepreneur seeks to provide superior goods and services that ultimately offer consumers a more efficient means of achieving some end.  This creates efficiencies which result in greater future consumption, economic expansion and more jobs in the future.  The example I’ve used in the past is Alexander Graham Bell, the inventor of the telephone.  When Bell invented the phone he destroyed thousands of jobs.  Messengers and telegram services were slowly defunct.  But Bell created efficiencies through making communication more convenient.  And in doing so he helped generate higher economic growth and ultimately more jobs in the future by streamlining what was once an arduous process – long distance communication.  Bell created countless jobs by creating this efficiency.  In this regard, capitalists, producers and innovators can be seen “job creators”.

But producers are nothing without consumers.  Bell’s telephone is nothing without consumers who want to use it.  So production and consumption are ultimately two sides of the same coin.  You cannot say that producers create jobs without consumers because without the consumers the producer has no revenue stream with which to expand his/her business and hire the workers that allow him/her to leverage the labor into future profits.   The capitalists need the consumers before they can ever consider expanding.  In this regard, demand is the driver of “job creation” and so consumers can also bee seen as “job creators” because they enable the capitalists to be able to hire in the first place.

So the answer to this silly debate is really rather simple.  The real “job creators” are the consumers AND the producers.  It’s that simple.  Maybe, just maybe, this understanding will help people understand that policies that focus on one side of the coin and not the other, are just as silly as this debate.  But I don’t have my hopes up.  The ideologies surrounding this debate are far too powerful to be overcome by pragmatism.

7 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On September 04, 2012 at 6:17 PM, awallejr (83.96) wrote:

Odd I can't get my reply to take here.

Report this comment
#2) On September 04, 2012 at 6:17 PM, awallejr (83.96) wrote:

Yet it took that one lol.  Will try once more,

Report this comment
#3) On September 04, 2012 at 6:29 PM, awallejr (83.96) wrote:

Oddest thing I can't seem to get my response to take hold.  Guessing the website hated it;/

Report this comment
#4) On September 05, 2012 at 1:53 AM, awallejr (83.96) wrote:

http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/my-response-to-binves-recent/759531

Report this comment
#5) On September 05, 2012 at 10:24 AM, miteycasey (30.86) wrote:

What happened to 'If you build it they will come'?

Apple didn't have a customer to the iPhone. People in the know even said it would fail. But a funny thing happened, the consumer loved it and switched from 'dumb' phones to 'smart' phones.

I think it's a bit of a chicken and egg conundrum.

 

Report this comment
#6) On September 13, 2012 at 9:40 AM, binve (< 20) wrote:

Hey awallejr, sorry for the posting issues, I don't know what's up. Good thoughts, and I added a comment to your post: http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/my-response-to-binves-recent/759531#comment761223

 

Report this comment
#7) On September 14, 2012 at 12:02 AM, portefeuille (99.60) wrote:

update of "my chart".



enlarge

 

all more or less as "predicted" :)

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement