Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

TheDumbMoney (58.47)

Why I Bought the Emerging Markets -- VWO

Recs

5

January 30, 2011 – Comments (7) | RELATED TICKERS: VWO , EEM , SPY

I also posted this as a pitch, as always recently I'm posting it as a blog, too, since I tend to get more comments and criticism here:

----

Why an emerging markets ETF:  Instead of purchasing a new stock this month, I am planning to continue my strategy of diversification.  I understand that: 1) the benefits of diversification are less now that all markets appear to be more correlated; 2) emerging markets have had a massive decade-long run and mean reversion may kick in.  However, the reality is that over the next twenty years, these are going to be the markets to be in.  That is true EVEN IF China is a bubble and emerging markets experience a major tanking this week or in the next few years.  Do I think Europe will perform better over the next twenty years?  No.  The U.S.? No.  Japan?  No.  So more money needs to be allocated here.  I was planning to purchase this ETF anyway, but the fact that the Egypt protests, and inflation worries, and international interest rate hikes have tanked the fund (and all emerging stocks) since the start of the new year makes it easier to begin a position, even though it may go down significantly farther in the short term.  At this point its performance compared to the S&P for the last year is about even -- all of 2010's gains have been erased.

Why VWO and not EEM or some other emerging ETF? -- Well, as between VWO and EEM, both cover the whole universe of emerging stocks, all countries.  But VWO's expense ratio is 0.27%, versus EEM's 0.69%.  So why would anyone invest in EEM instead of in VWO?  Good question!  EEM's only selling point apparently is increased liquidity for institutional buyers.  Am I an institutional buyer?  No.  In general, for ETFs one should look to Vanguard first -- theirs are the cheapest.  If they don't have something (as yet, they don't have country-specific funds), then turn to iShares, etc.  This is complicated only by the fact that apparently certain brokers offer EEM at a zero cost basis, absorbing the cost themselves.  As for VWO versus country-specific funds, I should have started with this rather than with BRF.  As far as I'm concerned, a low-cost generalist Vanguard ETF or mutual fund is the best and safest place for a real life investor to start investing in emerging markets stocks.  Do I REALLY know enough about emerging markets to know that Brazil is the best place to start?  No.  Is that my gut reaction?  Sure, but in case I'm wrong, I'm moving to this instead, while maintaining the BRF position I previously initiated.

I am opening a very small position.  I continue to think quality large-cap U.S. stocks offer the most value at this time, in any market anywhere in the world.  However, over the next three to five years I intend to slowly dollar-cost-average my way into a variety of emerging markets stocks, mainly via ETFs, though I may invest in a few individual companies as well.

7 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On January 30, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Valyooo (99.82) wrote:

Excellent.  I like a simpler way of analyzing which ETF to use.  Pull up a max chart of VWO, then compare to EEM.  They are both roughly the same, while VWO has a higher dividend, so I still come to the same conclusion as you.

Report this comment
#2) On January 30, 2011 at 7:53 PM, anchak (99.84) wrote:

I will refrain from the timing - as long as you are willing to average cost....

From a pure LT/MT investment perspective VWO is the correct choice - exactly for the reasons you have mentioned.

 All the best!

Report this comment
#3) On January 30, 2011 at 8:29 PM, TheDumbMoney (58.47) wrote:

anchak, thanks, yeah, I understand the timing issues.  It is a very small position, though CAPS may reflect red for quite awhile.  I tell myself this:  those who bought the S&P every month from the top in 2007 have a 14% or so positive cumulative return through last week.  Those who bought the Dow just before the 1929 crash were gazillionaires by this week if they simply never sold anything.

Report this comment
#4) On January 30, 2011 at 11:26 PM, portefeuille (99.78) wrote:

EVEN IF China is a bubble

--------------

China Record Discount to Hong Kong Means `Buy' for Prudential

...

The MSCI China Index’s 9.2 percent slump since November has left it trading at 11.7 times estimated profit for 2011, data compiled by Bloomberg show. The MSCI Hong Kong Index rallied 26 percent between July and December, beating China shares by the most in nine years and pushing its valuation to 17.5 times earnings, the highest ever compared with shares on the mainland.

...

--------------

 

(I am not a fan of "P/E of indices". Just make sure to buy when the "caps" game blog post bears tell you that "the P/E of the S&P 500 index is at 1000", hehe ...)

Report this comment
#5) On January 30, 2011 at 11:27 PM, portefeuille (99.78) wrote:

to buy

you buy

Report this comment
#6) On January 31, 2011 at 1:28 AM, TheDumbMoney (58.47) wrote:

portefuille, thanks.  That sort of article, at a time like this when everyone from Chanos to Little Book of Sideways Markets guy is saying China is a bubble, is why I try always to put a little money in stocks every month, and why I try not to pay too much attention to the macro-picture (while still keeping track of it).  I'm not a trader like you are, just a guy trying to build a retirement fund and a nest egg.  I'll be dollar-cost averaging into VWO in the coming months, and also adding some country-specific ETFs, including China.

Report this comment
#7) On February 01, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Valuevest (98.05) wrote:

VWO is my biggest real life holding (Berkshire is #2). I Also have shorted some EDZ (which is another way of being long Emerging markets). I am not planning to sell any till retirement and will add on dips. Have also started buying into VSS since it has decent exposure to smaller caps and Canada.

 

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement