Use access key #2 to skip to page content.

lquadland10 (< 20)

Yep this is change we can believe in. Not. A Trillion here a trillion there. Hear a trillion there a trillion everywhere a trillion. Space Shuttle Ben is at it again and so is Congress.

Recs

9

March 21, 2009 – Comments (5) | RELATED TICKERS: POT , AUY , GLD

Auditors project deeper deficits for Obama budget By ANDREW TAYLOR
Associated Press writer
Published: Friday, March 20, 2009 11:21 PM CDT
E-mail this story | Print this page

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Barack Obama's budget would produce $9.3 trillion in deficits over the next decade, more than four times the deficits of Republican George W. Bush's presidency, congressional auditors said Friday.

The new Congressional Budget Office figures offered a far more dire outlook for Obama's budget than the new administration predicted just last month - a deficit $2.3 trillion worse. It's a prospect even the president's own budget director called unsustainable.

In his White House run, Obama assailed the economic policies of his predecessor, but the eye-popping deficit numbers threaten to swamp his ambitious agenda of overhauling health care, exploring new energy sources and enacting scores of domestic programs.


The dismal deficit figures, if they prove to be accurate, inevitably raise the prospect that Obama and his Democratic allies controlling Congress would have to consider raising taxes after the recession ends or else pare back his agenda.

By CBO's calculation, Obama's budget would generate deficits averaging almost $1 trillion a year of red ink over 2010-2019.

Worst of all, CBO says the deficit under Obama's policies would never go below 4 percent of the size of the economy, figures that economists agree are unsustainable. By the end of the decade, the deficit would exceed 5 percent of gross domestic product, a dangerously high level.



White House budget chief Peter Orszag said that CBO's long-range economic projections are more pessimistic than those of the White House, private economists and the Federal Reserve and that he remained confident that Obama's budget, if enacted, would produce smaller deficits.

Even so, Orszag acknowledged that if the CBO projections prove accurate, Obama's budget would produce deficits that could not be sustained.

"Deficits in the, let's say, 5 percent of GDP range would lead to rising debt-to-GDP ratios that would ultimately not be sustainable," Orszag told reporters.



Deficits so big put upward pressure on interest rates as the government offers more attractive interest rates to attract borrowers.

"I think deficits of 5 percent (of GDP) are unsupportable," said economist Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com. "It will lead to higher interest rates to the point where it will force policymakers to make changes."

Republicans immediately piled on.



"This report should serve as the wake-up call this administration needs," said House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio. "We simply cannot continue to mortgage our children and grandchildren's future to pay for bigger and more costly government."

But Obama insisted on Friday that his agenda is still on track.

"What we will not cut are investments that will lead to real growth and prosperity over the long term," Obama said. "That's why our budget makes a historic commitment to comprehensive health care reform. That's why it enhances America's competitiveness by reducing our dependence on foreign oil and building a clean energy economy."



Obama's $3.6 trillion budget for the 2010 fiscal year beginning Oct. 1 contains ambitious programs to overhaul the U.S. health care system and initiate new "cap-and-trade" rules to combat global warming.

Both initiatives involve raising federal revenues sharply higher, but those dollars wouldn't be used to defray the burgeoning deficit and would instead help pay for Obama's health plan and implement Obama's $400 tax credit for most workers and $800 for couples.

Obama's budget promises to cut the deficit to $533 billion in five years. The CBO says the red ink for that year will total $672 billion.



Most disturbing to Obama allies like Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D., are the longer term projections, which climb above $1 trillion again by the end of the next decade and approach 6 percent of GDP by 2019.

Among about a dozen major changes to Obama's budget, Conrad is looking to curb Obama's 9 percent increase for non-defense appropriations to show short-term progress and insists that the long-term deficit and debt crisis will have to be addressed via a special bipartisan commission.

"The budget that I'll submit will cut the deficit by more than two-thirds over these first five years," Conrad. "These imbalances are just absolutely unsustainable."



The worsening economy is responsible for the even deeper fiscal mess inherited by Obama. As an illustration, CBO says the deficit for the current budget year, which began Oct. 1, will top $1.8 trillion, $93 billion more than foreseen by the White House. That would equal 13 percent of GDP, a level not seen since World War II.

The 2009 deficit, fueled by the $700 billion Wall Street bailout and diving tax revenues stemming from the worsening recession, is four times the previous $459 billion record set just last year.

The CBO's estimate for 2010 is worse as well, with a deficit of almost $1.4 trillion expected under administration policies, about $200 billion more than predicted by Obama.



Long-term deficit predictions have proven notoriously fickle - George W. Bush inherited flawed projections of a 10-year, $5.6 trillion surplus and instead produced record deficits - and if the economy outperforms CBO's expectations, the deficits could prove significantly smaller.

Republicans say Obama's budget plan taxes, spends and borrows too much, and they've been sharply critical of his $787 billion economic stimulus measure and a just-passed $410 billion omnibus spending bill that awarded big increases to domestic agency budgets.

The administration says it inherited deficits totaling $9 trillion over the next decade and that its budget plan cuts $2 trillion from those deficits. But most of those spending reductions come from reducing costs for the war in Iraq.



5 Comments – Post Your Own

#1) On March 21, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Andyman (94.33) wrote:

Wait a minute. If $9-trillion of the 9.3-trillion deficit were inherited from the Bush administration, then you're complaining about the wrong president!

Report this comment
#2) On March 21, 2009 at 11:06 PM, zversyp (< 20) wrote:

Wait a minute.  You're speaking as if there's a difference between the two besides an ability to say actual words during speeches.

Report this comment
#3) On March 22, 2009 at 3:10 AM, uclayoda87 (29.37) wrote:

Prior to the recent CBO update, a WSJ editorial noted that if we tax everyone making over $70,000 per year 100% of their income we could come close to balancing this year's budget.

Unfortunately the WJS did not take into consideration that people making over $70,000 have to eat, get to work, pay a mortgage and of course pay other taxes.  This would lead to futher government assistance programs to support the high earners, who were taxes everything.

The government would eventually decide what you need, but not to worry, this theory was well worked out by Karl Marx.

Report this comment
#4) On March 22, 2009 at 3:47 AM, KamranatUCLA (29.44) wrote:

we have a shoratge of hot, white, single, blonde girls in Los Angeles. This is already a sign of the communist Obama adminstration...this now...wait in lines to get a loaf of bread later.

Obama needs to do 2 things:

import blonde girls from Texas to Los Angeles so all Persian men/Iranian men would be happy here.

second, he should promote capitalism so that government won't be needed to interfere, so in short he should let Vegas legalize prostitution.

Report this comment
#5) On March 22, 2009 at 8:09 AM, lquadland10 (< 20) wrote:

LOL I love you guys and your answers.

Report this comment

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement