Hello, Fool! | Login | Signup | My Fool
Oct 12, 2008 5:42 AM ET | Feedback | Site Changes | Help
The Company provides Intellectual Technology solutions and services to the banking industry in China.
View All Commentary (YTEC)
Recs
motleysmart (69.34) Submitted: 5/18/08 2:37 AM : Start Price: $13.42 YTEC Score: -5.37
Expect explosive growth of this company in the next five year at least. The only way this stock is not going to perform well is that the company executives steal the money and artificially make the net profit (meaning after all "expenses") lower than it should be, or keeps diluting the shares with greed (that's another way to steel from the shareholders). I'd like to believe (hope anyway) that this is not going to happen with Yucheng. Now let me tell you why the stock fell 30% after the 1Q report. Its net profit was 33% lower than what expected by the analysts. If that's all you heard, you would be thinking about a company that's in some serious troubles. Nothing is further from the truth. The truth is that the company is doing incredibly well. Its real profit for 2008Q1 is actually 88% higher than that of 2007Q1. Dilution of shares was one cause for the not-so-high EPS, but of course that was taken into consideration by analysts already before the 1Q release. What caused the lower than expected profit was that the company decided to spend some of its gross income on a critically important business expanding opportunity, namely to install point-of-sale (POS) machines. POS is seeing explosive growth in China. At this point, it's at a "land grab" stage. Because of it's nature of a fixture within a banking-merchant system, once an early player got in, it’s difficult for the later comers to get in. For a company like Yucheng, POS is an investment opportunity of a life time. I would say it would be foolish if the company had decided to save the money to just impress its stockholders. So the company did what it should. One of course should not be surprised by a temporary penalty on it stock prices due to an EPS that's lower than expected. What IS surprising is the magnitude of the drop, which seems to be a reflection of the "huge" drop of the net earnings. But this where many people are misunderstanding, largely because of the simple math misconception. To explain this, let me give you a simple hypothetical:Suppose a company has a known earning pattern of Q1 = 1.5M, Q2 = 3M, Q3=7.5M, Q4 = 3M. If the company incurs a 0.5M one-time extra expense, what would be the impact on the earnings? The answer, which is quite simple, is that it depends on which quarter the expense happens. If it's Q1, the impact is 30%, if it's Q3, it would be 6.5%. Well, you see, that's Yucheng's Q1 story. We just happen to be looking at it Q1 results when the profit is known to be the lowest of the year. If you are seeing what I am saying, you would buy this stock and would not be surprised by the company's better than expected earnings in the next two quarters. Then, if you are a long term investor, you should buy this stock at the present price any way, whether or not you understanding the above math.
Report this Post Replies: 4 | Reply
Oops! There appears to be a problem with your comment. Check to see if there's something you left out.
motleysmart (69.34) Submitted: 5/20/08 2:00 PM
Recs: 0 | Rec This
To be more exact in the case of YTEC, it expects $1.5 million extra spending on POS throughout 2008, of which more than $.5 million is frontloaded in Q1, which also happens to be the quarter that has the lowest earnings (a known pattern for YTEC) . Therefore, it's a coincidental double whammy on the net earnings. Analysts had considered the $1.5 million expenses to be spread over the year, factored that into the total earnings of about $15 million, giving approximately a 10% downward adjustment on the EPS for 2008. This is all fine, and was in the pre-Q1 knowledge. Then everybody was surprised by the 33% difference for Q1. But the real reason that caused the surprise is that people don't have a good sense of math. Nothing should be surprising if you look at the above math. At the time of this writing, the stock price of YTEC is $11.90, nearly a 40% drop from its recent peak at $19.60, all caused by a "disappointing" Q1 report, or a gross misunderstanding thereof.The company has just reassured that its outlook is in line with the pre-Q1 expectations. The company expects a GAAP EPS $0.75 (or pro forma EPS $.83). As the Q1 EPS was a measly $0.08, what does that tell you for the rest of the quarters? By the end of 2008, YTEC will have an net GAAP EPS $.75 (or adjusted EPS over $1.00), with an expected 30%-70% growth of net earnings in 2009. With its massive POS deployment, future earnings will only accelerate. By that time, it is easy to make the case for $22 for the stock (which happens to be the present 12 month target price). I'd say $18-$20 by the end of 2008, $30 by the end of 2009.
Report this Post Reply
motleysmart (69.34) Submitted: 5/21/08 11:55 AM
Well, I think this stock just touched the bottom at 11.10 this morning and is leaving now to go back to it's previous highs ($19). Present average target price by analysts is $22.50, but some analysts are raising it. Every once a while, one sees a solid stock driven to such unthinkable lows by mysterious forces (institutional investor's greed assisted by retail investors stupidity). I thought I was cold-hearted cynical when I believed it would go down to as low as $12 as I was determined not to underestimate the stupidity of retail investors this time. Still I was wrong. It went down to 11.10. The great wealth redistribution, from the poor to the rich. Sigh.
motleysmart (69.34) Submitted: 7/17/08 4:24 PM
08Q2 (August 08) will be an interesting quarter. What is going to be important is not only the actual earnings, but also their guidance for the fiscal year. Suppose they meet the current expectation of $.13, AND continue to confirm the previous outlook of $.80-$.85 of year 08, that would mean the earnings for the Q3 and Q4 will need to be in the range of $.58 - $.63 ($.80-$.09-$.13 = $.58), significantly higher than the $.43 of 07Q3 and 07Q4 total. If this is the case, the price will move significantly higher from the current price ($10.7) upon 08Q2 earnings (August 2008).After 08Q2, if the actual earnings of Q3 comes out to again meetingthe expectation, the stock will move beyond $20 a share. By then, theburdens of the frontloading expenses of POS is behind, and the futurewill look even brighter.To put this into some perspective, last year at this time, when thestock price was $8, the company barely had a profitable history andthe investors were pricing it based on the extrapolated annualearnings of 4 x $0.09 (07Q1) <$.40. When the 07Q2 earnings of $0.15came out, the stock price jumped as high as $18 within a month. Itthen fluctuated from there but was still close to $18 before 08Q1.We all know now how the earnings of 08Q1 brought the stock down.Although it is clear that the only thing that is depressing theearnings is the temporary POS expenses, the stock price went downnonetheless based on the near-term earnings. The market isnearsighted, and that is not a secret. But there are strong reasons,all factors considered including the historical data, to believe thatwe have seen the bottom.Both banking IT and POS are sunrise industries in China. Yuchengpresently has relatively little competition. It's hard to imagine thecompany to lose its steam. Even if it does not become a dominatingplayer among providers of banking IT and POS, the company will stillsee explosive growth in the next decade. The market is so huge that itwill easily accommodate the coexistence of several multibillion dollarcompanies in the same sector. Yucheng is presently under $200M. That should give you an idea of its future growth.It's true that the present cash flow situation has not been great. Butthe situation in China is different from that in the US. In the caseof Yucheng, the biggest reason why the company suffers from cash flowproblems from time to time in the past is because its customers don'thave a great tradition to pay bills timely. Chinese banks. You have tobe familiar with the situation there in order to understand this. Butthese customs do pay eventually.Dilution. It will occur. But there are two things need to be takeninto consideration. First, the current price per share already takesinto consideration of the dilution that has occurred. Although the EPSseems flat compared to 07, the total earnings are significant higher.Had it not been the temporary expenses of POS, the EPS would have been significantly higher than that of 07 even after the dilution.Second, further dilution may still happen, but it will not happenbecause of any cash flow problem, but because of the company'sinternal compensation schemes. A significant part of its stock-basedcompensation is conditioned on the stock prices. If the company doeswell as expected, the stock price goes up despite the dilution. Aslower-growing stock price triggers less dilution, vice versa. Sothere is an inherent balance factor.
motleysmart (69.34) Submitted: 8/01/08 12:32 PM
One thing I hate to see is this stock runs up based on unreasonable expectations before Q2, then does an emotional selloff due to childish disappointment. That will again force me to trade the stock. Some factors to be considered: In the first quarter, the POS expense contributed -.04 while the non-POS business contributed a +.01 beat to estimate. As a result, the EPS missed the estimate by 0.03 (which comes from -.04 + .01). The market considered that the big deal, because it was a 30% miss. I wrote about the mathematical blindness of the market because it fails to realize that the ostensible high percentage miss was caused by the seasonal low earnings as a percentage basis in the first quarter. In the upcoming second quarter, the POS expense is expected to contribute another -.04, but the current estimates took that into consideration (this in contrast to a total surprise of that expense in Q1). The current estimates started with the original estimate of .16, did a -.04 (for POS) then a + .01 (as an upward adjustment for non-POS income based on the Q1 performance), to arrive at the current estimate of .13. I believe this is reasonable. I think the worst scenario could be that the POS contributes -.05 (25% more than estimated), and the non-POS earnings miss another .01 from the current estimate. That will give us an EPS of .11 for Q2, a 15% miss. Although this would be far better than the 30% miss of Q1, another childish emotional selloff is virtually guaranteed. However, I am optimistic that the above scenario will not occur. First, although it is very likely that the POS expenses in Q2 will increase over Q1, that expense will be at least partially offset by the income generated from the previously installed POS. Because the company expects a breakeven point by the end of 2008, it appears that these POS generate income as soon as they are installed. Second, at least one analyst believes that the revenue for Q2 is going to be significantly higher than the original expectation, due to fast ramp up by the banks in preparation for Olympics. A Roth Capital Partners analyst on June 30 raised the second-quarter sales forecast by $8.5 million to $24.5 million. That would be a quarterly sequential increase of 53% over Q1, and more than doubles the Q2 of 2007. If that turns out to be true, the EPS for Q2 will beat the current estimate by a large margin. Based on the announcement on July 23 of the $13.7 million project for China Construction Bank, this is not implausible. The strange thing about that announcement was that it said the majority of the system integration portion is realized in the second quarter, while the majority of the solution and implementation services will be recognized in the third quarter. Don't know how much goes to the second-quarter, but this announcement of the "past news" sounded almost like an intentional giveaway of a positive surprise for Q2. Cash flow isn't something this company can be proud of. But as I said before, this is mainly caused by the unpredictable payments by its customers (Chinese banks). But these customers do pay. Also, the cash flow situation for Q2 is going to be particularly favorable because in the beginning of this quarter, the company recovered a large amount of cash (something like $15 million), which presumably are delayed payments. Well, I don't claim that I know something that others don't. I just know that I don't like surprises. I would like to see steady growth of this company, and its stock price, not a roller coaster ride.