New Energy Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQOTH:NENE)

CAPS Rating: 1 out of 5

The Company together with its wholly owned subsidiaries, is a technology incubator focused on the identification, acquisition, development and eventual commercialization of emerging technologies.

Results 1 - 20 of 20

Recs

0
Member Avatar TSIF (99.96) Submitted: 7/21/2014 4:35:47 PM : Underperform Start Price: $2.15 NENE Score: +13.84

New Energy Technologies is a speculative play that is entirely too speculative. Still, it has a decent following and holds it's share price pretty tight. A $2.00 share price had held for about year, with forays up to $2.50 and even $3.00, so was the $2.00 to $1.60 from June to July a breakdown (Finally) or entry point for those with blinders on?? It appeared to rebound and I took my chances, and so far, my timing is good..but this could just be a "wave", consolidate higher....

Overall, the metrics and fundamentals on New Energy Technologies stinks. Volume is low, but as new shares get issued, this should break down as those with conviction bias get a reality adjustment.

The no "mon", no "fun" perpetual share printing machine with a 40X book, cash burn of $3M a year, but minimal burn on it's three employees, gonna save the world business model, will eventually crash.

Two great ideas, hence the Koolaide drinkers...but no real world revenue generating applications.

"SolarWindow electricity generating system, which facilitates to harvest light energy from the sun and artificial sources; and generate electricity from a see-through and semi-transparent coating of organic photovoltaic solar cells."

"MotionPower-Auto, a fluid-driven system for installation at sites where cars and light-duty trucks travel below 15mph and are in the process of slowing down"

Speculation...over done.

=============

10-July-14 10-Q.
"We do not currently have any commercial products and there is no assurance that we will successfully be able to design, develop, manufacture, or sell any commercial products in the future.
Our product development programs involve ongoing research and development efforts, and the commitment of significant resources to support the extensive invention, design, engineering, testing, prototyping, and intellectual property initiatives carried-out by our contract engineers, scientists, and consultants. "

We have an accumulated deficit of $19,454,756 through May 31, 2014. Included in the deficit are non-cash expenses totaling $4,883,373 relating to the issuance of stock for services, compensatory stock options, warrants granted for value and accretion of debt discount. Due to the "start-up" nature of our business, we expect to incur losses as we continue development of our OPV and energy harvesting technologies and expand

3,395,955 received in 2008 pursuant to a securities purchase agreement ("SPA") in which we issued 3,675,000 shares of common stock and a like number of Class F Warrants;

� $1,044,500 received in 2009 from the exercise of 20,000 Class E Warrants and 826,000 Class F Warrants;

� $3,954,375 received in 2011 from the exercise of 1,054,512 Class F Warrants;

� $1,000,000 received in 2012 pursuant to the 2012 Bridge Loan;

� $1,200,000 received in 2013 from the consummation of a self-directed registered offering of common stock and Series H Warrants on February 1, 2013; and

� $3,000,000 received on October 7, 2013 from the issuance of the Note.

Recs

0
Member Avatar TerryHogan (99.94) Submitted: 7/13/2014 2:21:16 AM : Underperform Start Price: $1.73 NENE Score: -7.57

Dilution, no revenue, no business model.

Recs

0
Member Avatar Stockwisdom (< 20) Submitted: 12/17/2013 7:11:50 PM : Outperform Start Price: $2.35 NENE Score: -31.37

Cutting edge technology and patent applications.

Recs

0
Member Avatar chk999 (99.97) Submitted: 7/19/2013 1:28:37 PM : Underperform Start Price: $1.74 NENE Score: +10.43

Not going to make money.

Recs

1
Member Avatar BuffettJunior1 (97.52) Submitted: 4/14/2011 6:16:01 PM : Underperform Start Price: $2.35 NENE Score: +70.73

Worthless company, the only thing its good for is earning me easy CAPS points.

Recs

0
Member Avatar KimLanners (< 20) Submitted: 4/13/2011 1:12:59 PM : Underperform Start Price: $2.25 NENE Score: +67.77

bad technicals

Recs

3
Member Avatar Dormin111ob (95.79) Submitted: 1/27/2011 1:30:30 PM : Underperform Start Price: $6.70 NENE Score: +131.30

"New Energy Technologies, Inc., through its subsidiaries, engages in the identification, acquisition, development, and commercialization of alternative energy technologies. It focuses on the development of MotionPower, a technology for capturing the kinetic energy of moving vehicles in order to use this captured energy to generate electricity;"

Not the worst idea I've ever heard. But it is still an alternative energy company and therefore worthless.

Recs

1
Member Avatar pirate10 (< 20) Submitted: 4/18/2008 8:52:52 AM : Outperform Start Price: $5.52 NENE Score: -113.97

This stock has the potential to put the business & homeowner in the driver seat to produce electricity.

Recs

2
Member Avatar MJKpayday (99.76) Submitted: 12/29/2007 9:10:55 AM : Underperform Start Price: $5.91 NENE Score: +108.26

"Technology incubator?" These chicks won't hatch. It's amazing how such companies can still be valued at 100M+.

Everydayinvestor has a great right up, thanks!

Recs

1
Member Avatar SewellMarbury (63.86) Submitted: 12/22/2007 8:44:55 PM : Underperform Start Price: $6.48 NENE Score: +109.40

their is one word to describe this despicable company: false

Recs

0
Member Avatar capmarkcap (44.29) Submitted: 12/5/2007 4:16:47 PM : Outperform Start Price: $7.80 NENE Score: -115.13

even if the solar glass nanoparticles do not work as planned, the resulting technology in related products will be outstanding,

Recs

0
Member Avatar BrianRuth (98.91) Submitted: 11/25/2007 5:51:05 PM : Underperform Start Price: $6.66 NENE Score: +115.12

Sorry, we're still trying to incubate profits. Check back in a month and see if we're still here (and if so, if we have anything).

Recs

0
Member Avatar theeconomicsguy (98.59) Submitted: 11/14/2007 10:35:11 AM : Underperform Start Price: $9.81 NENE Score: +113.40

The Company doesn't develop products or have any other real means of making money. Instead, it lets others do the work and then buy the idea from them. Any idea worth anything is going to be exploited by the developer, not sold to some incubating company. This company will just end up with the left-overs, which will eventually end up on the clearance rack at the nearest "As seen on tv" store. Ride this one the whole way into bankruptcy.

Recs

0
Member Avatar CrimsonMan10 (< 20) Submitted: 10/18/2007 4:14:01 PM : Underperform Start Price: $7.56 NENE Score: +110.33

I'm with the Fools on this one

Recs

0
Member Avatar thebenjamin (< 20) Submitted: 10/16/2007 2:22:56 PM : Underperform Start Price: $9.30 NENE Score: +114.14

A poor company that publicly admitted they are going nowhere. The stock was overvalued, and crashed accordingly, and is still worth too much. Get rid of it while you can.

Recs

0
Member Avatar tcampbellla (75.83) Submitted: 9/20/2007 4:09:01 AM : Underperform Start Price: $12.84 NENE Score: +120.82

Why has this stock been going up?

Recs

0
Member Avatar gaiachild (75.66) Submitted: 9/8/2007 4:18:49 PM : Underperform Start Price: $13.05 NENE Score: +127.34

stat geek

Recs

0
Member Avatar LarriveeRocks (< 20) Submitted: 9/1/2007 5:40:01 PM : Underperform Start Price: $13.22 NENE Score: +126.63

Nice idea, no money to back it up.

Recs

0
Member Avatar sugardadE (97.91) Submitted: 8/28/2007 12:57:21 AM : Underperform Start Price: $12.81 NENE Score: +127.43

These guys "incubate" technology for "eventual commercialization". If you build a mousetrap, they will come (and get whacked). A company with no products; real novel I must admit.

Recs

1
Member Avatar kristm (99.75) Submitted: 7/24/2007 2:29:17 AM : Underperform Start Price: $8.28 NENE Score: +113.08

First, the technology looks like total BS to the degree of being laughable. And second, why is a firm which claims to be little more than an R&D outfit planning to increase its research spending? Since research is all they do, they should already be putting all their available resources into, you know... researching stuff.

But even if it's all legit and the technology is viable, what kind of liability issues are we getting into? What does power-generating glass do when you bump, break, shatter, touch, or get an electronic device near it? If a product ever managed to come to market (none will) they still wouldn't last a year without being litigated to death. Not that any builder would ever buy or use the product since that would also make them liable for any of its shortcomings.

With all that said, we have to go back to my usual rule of thumb: Never trust a company that uses stock images on its web site. All those scientists, test tubes, and etc. are off a stock image CD from Getty or Corel. I would expect them to use pictures of their actual researchers doing research if they had any.

Results 1 - 20 of 20

Featured Broker Partners


Advertisement