Skip to main content
$4.39 -$0.04 (-0.9%)

04:00 PM EST on 03/04/24

Envela Corporation (NYSEMKT:ELA)

CAPS Rating: No stars

The Company and its subsidiaries, sells jewelry and bullion products to both retail and wholesale customers throughout the United States through its facilities in Dallas, Texas, Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, and through its internet sites.

Current Price $4.39 Mkt Cap $117.2M
Open $4.50 P/E Ratio 10.09
Prev. Close $4.39 Div. (Yield) $0.00 (0.0%)
Daily Range $4.35 - $4.51 Volume 55,457
52-Wk Range $3.02 - $8.05 Avg. Daily Vol. 23,904


How do you think NYSEMKT:ELA will perform against the market?

Add Stock to CAPS Watchlist

All Players

4 Outperform
2 Underperform

All-Star Players

0 Outperform
1 Underperform

Wall Street

0 Outperform
0 Underperform

Top NYSEMKT:ELA Bull/Bear Pitches

The best Bull and Bear pitches based on recency and number of recommendations.

Fiskhus (46.72)
Submitted August 05, 2022


Top Bear Pitch

There are no pitches that meet the Top Bear criteria. Explain

If this upsets you, start recommending pitches below!

Recent Community Commentary

Read the most recent pitches from players about ELA.


Member Avatar Fiskhus (46.72) Submitted: 8/5/2022 5:58:39 PM : Outperform Start Price: $7.51 NYSE MKT:ELA Score: -63.85



Member Avatar motleylorenzo2 (< 20) Submitted: 7/17/2011 9:35:35 PM : Outperform Start Price: $8.10 NYSE MKT:ELA Score: -335.64

Momentum traders and long-term growth investors have been piling into DGSE Companies, Inc. The stock is up 85% since March, and 220% since September. To understand present and possible future trading action, it's necessary to learn about the company's development.

For years, DGSE languished as a moribund operator of two wholesale and retail jewelry stores/pawnshops. The company rarely turned much of a profit. Margins were tiny. A few years ago, DGSE merged with Superior Galleries, an auction and retail rare coin operation that hadn't turned a profit in five years. Nothing came of it.

DGSE had long been controlled by its primary shareholder, Dr. Len Smith, a man with a talent for creative dealmaking, thanks to many years as a bankruptcy specialist. He struck a complex deal with the now-infamous Stanford Bank to provide DGSE with $11.5 million dollars in credit so the company could attempt to grow, and Stanford swapped out $8.4 million in Superior debt for equity.

Then Stanford blew up. Dr. Smith worked out a brilliant deal. The Stanford Receivor converted $11.5 million in debt and all the equity into 3 million DGSE shares, and sold them for $3.6 million -- essentially taking 15 cents on the dollar.

Yet DGSE didn't pay a dime.

Enter NTR Metals

The tab was picked up by NTR Metals, DGSE's primary gold scrapper, which also took control of the 3 million shares. NTR Metals is privately-held, a premier precious metals conglomerate, generating $2 billion in annual revenue. Attached was a clause allowing NTR to purchase 1 million DGSE shares directly from Dr. Smith for $6 per share within the next two years. At the time, the stock was trading at $2.50.

This presented three puzzling questions.

1) Why would NTR want to purchase a million shares far above the present stock price?

2) How could they unload the shares they'd already purchased? I could see why they'd buy DGSE shares at $1.20 a share and recognize an instant 100% paper gain. But at the time, DGSE was a thinly-traded microcap, and they'd never be able to unload the shares.

3) Given NTR's powerhouse stature in the industry, what possible operational synergies could they have with DGSE that they didn't already have or couldn't create themselves?

The answers came as NTR began buying shares in the open market. At the time, but no longer, DGSE shares were so thinly traded with such large spreads that a few hundred shares moved the stock significantly. It wasn't long before the stock broke $5, and NTR exercised their $6 option. That answered the first question.

In addition, NTR now owned close to 40% of DGSE. This was when a reverse merger concept hit me, along with the answers to the two remaining questions.

Reverse Merger In Play

This piecemeal reverse merger would be a way for NTR to offload parts of its business into the public market without the complexity of an IPO. The deal had Dr. Smith's fingerprints all over it. But a reverse merger from which NTR could see its investment value increase made no sense unless: 1) the stock became more liquid, 2) the share price continued to increase, and 3) shareholders were getting something of value, which so far they hadn't. $3.6 Million had gone to the Stanford Receivor and $6 million directly into Dr. Smith's pocket.

Then the other shoe dropped last month.

DGSE purchased Southern Bullion Trading (SBT), a part of NTR's domestic business in exchange for up to 600,000 shares of DGSE restricted stock. SBT would also put up a $2 million equity investment to be dedicated to SBT's expansion. That gave NTR even more control of DGSE while giving shareholders a viable bullion operation from which significant earnings would be generated. SBT's unaudited 2010 revenues were $35 million, generating $1.5 million in operating income. However, this was only based on a few stores and didn't include the full complement of revenues for the 12 new stores they opened during 2010, or the six they've opened so far this year.

Trading volume is now routinely over 30,000 shares. I believe volume will increase significantly as DGSE has finally found a growth vehicle. With increased volume comes tighter trading spreads, and less stock volatility. With all of these factors combined, NTR is successfully transitioning DGSE into a company deserving of analyst, mutual fund, and journalist coverage -- thereby creating a liquid market for the stock it holds. Question #2 was answered.

As for question #3, it's moot. NTR did not need DGSE for any of this. DGSE may have more experience dealing with the public directly, but NTR has so much expertise in the precious metals field that they didn't need to spend $11.6 million for DGSE's expertise. They also could have easily sold SBT to any number of other entities for a boatload of money, but that would've capped their upside.

No, NTR is in this because they wanted a public vehicle through which they could expand, and they fully intend to transform DGSE into a stock that is on everyone's radar.

And they are succeeding. Here's why DGSE is not only going to be a great momentum trade, but a solid growth play.

What It Means for Investors and Traders

It's all about the gold. Gold prices will remain high for quite some time. Diamonds, watches, other metals -- they'll all provide income for DGSE, but it's the gold that'll drive the growth.

Thanks to the weak economy, pawnshops and retail gold purchasing are on fire. First Cash Financial Services has seen mid-to-upper single digit increases in scrap volume over the past two years. Why do you see all the "WE BUY GOLD" signs? Because buyers like First Cash, EZCorp, and Cash America generate 40% gross margins buying from the public and selling to refiners like NTR.

As a refiner, NTR (and SBT) make their money refining the gold, and reselling it via their dealer desks. They make a net spread of 2 - 2.5% (4.1% on the operating income level). In addition, demand for physical gold bullion is rising. DGSE is opening its Bullion Express stores, where any person or firm can purchase physical bullion. The company can now play the market both ways, enjoying spreads on both the purchase, and resale (after refining).

From Fundamental Analysis to Price Target

DGSE reported an operating loss last year, and a $.05 profit in 2009 -- pretty typical for them. However, Q1 showed a 40% revenue increase and DGSE earned $.03 a share. Half the profit came from gold sales, half from jewelry sales. At the same run-rate, DGSE is looking at $0.12 per share for 2011. This does not include the SBT contribution. What might that be? We won't know until financials are released in a few weeks. But let's assume the 2010 numbers are based on 6 stores. In 2011, SBT will have at least twenty. So figure $115 million in 2011 revenue, and $5 million in operating income. But factoring in taxes, possible interest expense and just to be super-conservative, let's transfer just $3.5 million to the bottom line, or about $0.35 per share.

That gives DGSE $0.47 per share in earnings for 2011, and a 17x earnings multiple.

One sector I would use to make comparisons are the gold miners. The Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF trades at a P/E of 15, Newmont Mining is at 12.5x, Barrick Gold is at 13.4x, Kinross Gold trades at 18x, Goldcorp is at 19.5x, and El Dorado Gold trades at 19x. The average of these six securities is a 16 P/E, suggesting DGSE is fairly valued.

I might also compare it to the jewelry sellers. Tiffany and Company sells at 19x earnings, Signet Jewelers sells for about 16x earnings, and Harry Winston Diamond is hovering around 18x estimates. Again, DGSE seems fairly valued from this perspective.

Back to gold miners, however, Newmont trades 10% below analyst median estimates of $73, Kinross trades 15% below analyst's median target of $22.50, Goldcorp trades 15% below the median target of $66, and Barrick is 12% undervalued. This suggests DGSE may be 13% undervalued, and given the attention the stock has received from momentum traders, I think a 15% - 20% trading upside from here is absolutely possible, giving the stock a $9.60 price target in the short term, and possibly as high as $12 as the company makes it onto traders' radars.

Going forward, as a growth play, I think there is enormous potential due to the opportunity afforded by rapid SBT store expansion in the U.S., the Bullion Express concept expansion, and the long-term secular trend of strong gold prices. This alone should justify a 20% annualized growth rate.

Next, I doubt this is the last transaction we'll see between NTR and DGSE. NTR will want controlling ownership, meaning at least 51% of the shares. They will certainly move more assets into DGSE in exchange for more stock. I think that could push the company to 30% annualized growth.

Add in the momentum trading, and I would project a $12 stock price by year end, followed by 30% annualized growth over the next three years, giving a 2015 price target of $26. We'll know more as the story unfolds.


Find the members with the highest scoring picks in ELA.

Score Leader


Jumper5 (73.88) Score: +253.81

The Score Leader is the player with the highest score across all their picks in ELA.

Member Name Member
Call Time
Score Commentary
Jumper5 73.88 3/26/2013 Underperform 5Y $5.92 -24.55% +229.26% +253.81 0 Comment
Fiskhus 46.72 8/8/2022 Outperform 5Y $7.51 -40.48% +23.37% -63.85 1 Comment
outstandinghoof 33.32 8/5/2022 Outperform 5Y $7.55 -40.79% +24.01% -64.81 0 Comment
JoeySolitro1 99.94 5/11/2015 Underperform 5Y $1.15 +288.70% +141.92% -146.77 0 Comment
Anth741 < 20 7/20/2011 Outperform 5Y $8.87 -49.63% +285.54% -335.17 0 Comment
motleylorenzo2 < 20 7/18/2011 Outperform 5Y $8.10 -44.81% +290.83% -335.64 2 Comments

Wall Street

See what the Wall Street professionals think, according to their public statements and filings.

There are no Wall Street tracker picks for ELA.